@ada@blahaj.zone @fediversenews @ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone @maegul It would probably make more sense for an organisation to do it for members. But I’d quite like the simplicity of a one stop shop. I’ve set up several accounts on different platforms to try them out. They’re all obviously me, but not linked, which is a pain.

@aswath @ada@blahaj.zone @fediversenews @ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone @maegul No, they’d be separate but linked. So @user@lemmy.example.com @user@mastodon.example.com and @user@pixelfed.example.com would all be created at the same time and refer to the same user in a shared LDAP user database. Maybe the alsoKnownAs field would be useful? Some people would love this, others will hate it.

@ada@blahaj.zone @fediversenews @ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone @maegul Are they completely separate or do they share a user database? I’m pretty sure Mastodon will let you use an existing external LDAP service as the authentication backend, but I know nothing much about Lemmy. That would be a cool way to solve some people’s gripes about multiple Fediverse IDs. Have a cluster of Pixelfed, Mastodon, Lemmy, Bookwyrm all sharing a user list. One account, lots of features.