Skip Navigation
teams rule
  • It’s almost unusable for me and everyone I work with.

    Takes several attempts to join a meeting and have audio and mic working and screen shares working,

    freezes regularly for 30+ seconds at a time when interacting with anything in the ui (especially the mute button in calls),

    sharing your screen takes several attempts to get it to work,

    the calendar in it is rarely synced with outlook(maybe the new calendar in teams will work better?)

    These are just the issues my coworkers and I get on a daily basis. It’s not even touching the ones that only happen a few times a week.

    The only good thing I’ve experienced is the recorded meetings are shared quickly after the call ends.

  • Will Republicans try another Federal Right to Work attempt?
  • Edit: I’m mixing up a at will employment with right to work. Sorry for the confusion. See updated comment below:

    Right to work: Joining a union and paying union dues can no longer be a requirement of employment. This slowly degrades the power of the union and ultimately reduces wages and benefits of the workers

    Right to work At will employment is: A right to be fired at any point for any reason or no reason at all

    The goal is to get around any union protections that require things like a legitimate reason to be fired from a job.

    It also has the added bonus of drastically reducing the benefits of unions and making them much easier to prevent.

  • Toronto cops are parking illegally everywhere with impunity so they can get coffee
  • While that’s a fair point, it’s not the only example of planning ahead. I’m sure there’s plenty of other ways than the ones I came up with in a few seconds.

    They could also pick a drive throughs that have enough room to leave the line. Less common in cities but they’re still there.

    Edit: I’d also like to point out that their lights and sirens are designed specifically to get people’s attention and get them moved out of the way. More difficult if you’re trying to get a vehicle 10 cars up to move but it’s not like they’re stuck waiting like the rest of us would be.

  • Toronto cops are parking illegally everywhere with impunity so they can get coffee
  • Non emergency needs are not an excuse for illegal behavior.

    If it’s that critical that they remain close to their vehicle then they should plan better. I.e. a drive through, coffee shop with parking, thermos full of coffee, have two officers per vehicle and one stays with the car, etc.

  • Kamala Harris to appear with running mate at rally in Philadelphia on Tuesday
  • ‘Kamala didn’t rebuke genocide strongly enough, so I’ll support the candidate that unabashedly supports and encourages genocide!’

    That is my understanding of your view based on the last two comments. Good luck with stopping the murder spree that way

    Edit: I’m all for better options. It’s just quite disingenuous to say you won’t vote for the only candidate that’s rebuffed Israel over the genocide when the competition is actively supporting it.

  • Heat waves are making restaurant kitchens unsafe. Workers are fighting back.
  • Seems the strikes are starting to work. Not quite there yet as ac still isn’t guaranteed

    But it incentivized due to extra pay during hot conditions

    In what is likely an industry first, the workers at Homegrown won language in their union contract in March that could help with that. The workers fought for a clause that allows them to receive time-and-a-half pay when temperatures in the store reach 82 degrees Fahrenheit and double pay when store temperatures reach 86 degrees F. (According to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, when a workplace reaches 77 degrees F, it becomes potentially unsafe for workers to engage in “strenuous work.”)

  • Biden supporters mostly back him in 2024 election because they oppose Trump, poll finds
  • You’ve claimed several points that conflict and when asked directly what your point is you talk around it.

    My point was Bernie got cheated out of that primary election

    Your point was that the primary was above board and there was no reason to question it

    Then you later agreed that there was good reason to question it

    And now your point is that your point is clear?

  • Biden supporters mostly back him in 2024 election because they oppose Trump, poll finds
  • Your initial statement was clear but your subsequent comments across threads have not been.

    It went from the primary was clear and upstanding, to there’s good reason to doubt the results, to it having no real effect other than some nasty words spoken, to it costing Hilary the election.

    Which one is your actual point?

  • Biden supporters mostly back him in 2024 election because they oppose Trump, poll finds
  • So you’re saying the DNC’s actions undermining the primary election had real consequences? Or are those consequences not concrete enough?

    Or are you saying we should accept their schemes, offer no consequences or criticism and just blindly follow?

    Cause I certainly agree that we likely wouldn’t be in the current situation if the DNC had been above board and true to their role.

  • Biden supporters mostly back him in 2024 election because they oppose Trump, poll finds
  • Convenient you skip over the undermine his campaign portion of my previous comment. But the fact that the Chair of the DNC resigned over it shows it was more than just saying "nasty things about him in private".

    It should also be noted that their actions "caused significant harm to the Clinton campaign, and have been cited as a potential contributing factor to her loss in the general election". It is not as inconsequential as you present it.

  • InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)LE
    LethalSmack @lemmy.world
    Posts 0
    Comments 65