Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)IR
Posts
7
Comments
6
Joined
1 yr. ago

  • Is this a joke? Do you release a completely rebuilt app, and UnifiedPush is still gone? Users of degoogled phones will still not have notifications? Will you still only use Google FCM?

    Why Google (FCM) notifications on Android are dangerous:

    Everyone knows that the content of the notification is encrypted, BUT THIS IS NOT ENOUGH:

    https://www.privacy-handbuch.de/handbuch_73.htm

    Requests to the PM Team (for example, for the implementation of Unified Push) have been ignored for many years.

    For some people, using a safe ProtonMail app with a dangerous FCM can be a disaster in some countries (journalists, signals, political opposition, etc.)

    Please repair it!

  • Proton @lemmy.world

    Are Proton apps safe before the TapTrap threat?

  • I am not associated with any tested company or this blog.

    I am an ordinary user of all Proton products since his birth and I love him.

    Because the test looks credible, I just want an expert from Proton to dispel my doubts or honestly confirm the problem.

  • In that case, it seems to me that the only threat is the mindless copying of public keys to other servers, as described in the article. But who does so? Do admins not create separate private-public keys for each server?

    Thank you for the explanation!

  • Proton @lemmy.world

    Why Google (FCM) notifications on Android are dangerous

    Linux @lemmy.world

    SSH backdoor infection

    Proton @lemmy.world

    Risk of security of emails in HTML format

    SimpleX Chat @lemmy.ml

    Why is Simplex calling to Google?

    Proton @lemmy.world

    New vulnerabilities in VPNs

    Proton @lemmy.world

    Snooze mail - great feature, broken execution