InternetCitizen2 @ InternetCitizen2 @lemmy.world

No one of consequence.

---

Read more

Posts

464

Comments

3,024

Joined

3 yr. ago

Speaking of, did everyone know there was a mini series, the good lord bird, about him?

... sin permiso.

I think a big reason for wanacy was also unpatched computers in corporate. Still it sucks that MS cannot be a good steward and chooses to keep a hostile attitude to its users in many regards.

I gotta say... I almost ate it.

I got room in my schedule

I mean its still their space, but its hard to disagree with you on that

I'm inclined to believe OP failed a tankie purity test or sometimes similar.

And some how, the small government libertarians are all gone...

Those are not the same thing?

#til

Grok, enhance this image

(••)
\ ( ••)>⌐■-■
\ (⌐■■)

I'm personally not against communism, they have some good ideas like universal child care, guaranteed jobs, and housing (even though the latter may be considered sub-par by some).

Tankies never seem to get that that part is not being critized, but the subversive of the movement by authoritarians.

Nextcloud has decks. Not sure how good they are.

I like to use super productivity, which does have kanban support as well.

If I may be indulged for a bit of a rant, Ancaps are basically flat earthers. Similar to flerfs they are not there for the stated reason. A flerf does not care about the shape of the earth. Their main motivation is a religious one and the shape of the earth is just some front end reasoning for the rest of their theology. Ancaps are not there because they care about economics or freedom; that is just there as academic cover for their bad political motivations.

Similar to a flerf they lash out when you point out a flaw in their thinking. If they did care about economics from a truth perspective that would be welcomed. In the natural sciences we have ruled out bad ideas (flat earth) or found that existing ones were incomplete (newton to general relativity). Pointing out that the NAP is not that end all be all logically or citing any historical precedent is not welcomed.

Even accepting some of their axioms as truth leads to bad outcomes. If I was in ancapistan and successful why would I risk a new comer bringing my trade fiefdom down when I can sabotage them. Or if profit is my motive, then why would I care about injust NAP violations that don't directly hurt my profit (further why not join the aggressors in a share of the spoils).

Ancaps (and Austrian Econ types) are to economics what flat earth is to physics.

Hmmm

This person has high level management energy

You heard it on Lemmy first!

Bait used to be believable

If its a joke its not even original: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0SjgYMLJW0k

They are "Halo: Spartan Assault" and "Halo: Spartan Strike". They are also on Steam and work great on the Steam Deck. I got them on sale for $1.50 earlier this year. They are alright for some casual gaming or traveling and don't want to kill your battery.