IPeaceInYourFace @ IPeaceInYourFace @lemmy.world

Posts

3

Comments

61

Joined

1 wk. ago

The technology has emerged before the infrastructure.

This is a fairly generic complaint that humans have had for 1000s of years.

I wouldn't worry about it.

You're right. But that's not real art is it. That's just a product for the masses. I'm talking about real, genuine art, provocative, unique expressions of reality.

And why is that? Because those creatives and designers can't sell their work.

That's what I'm saying. As a creative, most of your work is getting others to understand why your creations are worth it.

I admit, it's turning artists into salesman. But that's somewhat poetic. It's bridging the gap between how an artist expresses reality and their ability to relate that to the audience personally.

Isn't she a woman now?

It blows my mind that he had sex with countless little girls aged about 14 and literally nobody bats an eye

That explains why I can't read when I've sniffed ket

What do I call a water dog without sounding racist?

99% of art is selling it. You can't sell AI cos it doesn't have a story.

As long as your work has a story, it'll sell itself.

Looks like somebody's discovered Buddhism

I don't think robin is around anymore either.

Just make console. And then sell games for that console.

How hard can that be?

Init bro

That explains why one of my eyes turns off when I do loads of ket.

Is it a super adventure club?

Frutiger Aero is back in fashion!

Don't be sad that's gone, appreciate that it ever happened.

Also, remember to look up into the void and realise there's a genuine possibility that that goes on forever and none of this really matters.

You're literally stuck to a rock in the middle of nowhere and nobody knows why.

We did however, evolve to see it. And say...

"Whoever is reading this, I hope you have a really awesome day! We're all trying our best with what we know, so give yourself a break. You've got this. Just one foot in front of the other."

Well, the alternative was a lot more macabre. That would've been a controversial move as an artist.

Good. Fuck em

It never will be.

This asset can be used as collateral for leverage. So now the owner has it, they can use it to put up maybe around $30,000,000 if they have a good enough relationship with a broker.

Because of the way America is right now too, they can give trump a 10m cut if he slides a particular stock one way or another.

President gets 10m, punter gets got knows how much, and nobody is any the wiser.

It's the same with art, but with art, it's a lot more speculative, which is why you have so many god awful contemporary pieces, because again they'll pay an appraiser to say it's worth 100m when it's a handful of beans on a canvas, and then use that as collateral.

These are just infinite money glitches for the rich.

In all seriousness, there's nothing stopping you and your friends and their families from doing the same thing, but because it's not the system they designed they're going to be skeptical of it and not want to do that.