Same situation as the first Sigil.

The mega-wad pack is free, but if you want the guest soundtrack, you need to pay for it.

I'm just curious if those who have purchased either of the two games, could tell us if the soundtrack is waveform, or is it just a midi rendition.

I can understand not getting it for 6.66 Euros, but to limit it to boxed special copies is insane. I know I'd pay more than the asking price of the game for just MP3 files, but I'm not about to pay what Romero is asking for CD quality audio.

Well, yeah.

It's a Reagan era movie.

Of course they'll use the fallacy that only private industry can deal with an issue that was created specifically for the point of the movie.

If they chose something that was real, they'd find out that private industry is only effective when they have a public industry forcing them to compete on efficiency, rather than just fleecing the market.

What do you describe as "anti-men"

Do you mean "doesn't subscribe to 50s definition of a man being an angry, grown up boy?"

Yeah, smells like the cops that leaked her information and should be placed literally under a fire.

I'm sorry, aren't you one of the "hurr, durr, Trudeau blackface" crowd?

So NOW you believe people can change?

Trust a "centrist" to think a socialist is the same as an authoritarian.

Even more amazing, is if you read said "centrist's" comments, and see them agreeing with the same authoritarianism that charges up tankies.

I wouldn't trust them to pass a piss test, let alone to trust their opinions when it comes to children.

There can be rules about subletting on the lease, as well, the renter abusing the system for ABNB is likely to not be doing any vetting of renters.

In other words, this is Conservative projection

"They all want power and to not actually help"

In other words, this is Conservative projection

Hey, if they want to make shit harder on the homeless, they should at least admit that they don't give a fuck about the teachings of the person they claim to worship.

You haven't explained how hampering others from getting a home helps society.

You seem to think that we should be bending over backwards to protect the NIMBY crowd that cares only about themselves and couldn't give a fuck about others.

If they bought their house to live in they won't have a problem.

If they bought it because they wanted an investment that would appreciate in value, they knew the risks.

We haven't been in a stable market for the average person in over fifteen years.

I just can't muster up pity for the people who want to hold other people back just because they bought early.

It's that same pity which allowed flippers and investors to put us in this position to begin with

They bought a house, not an investment.

If they did buy it as an investment, well, they certainly should learn that investments aren't guaranteed, and that anyone promising that should have a watchdog alerted on them.

Will likely be an independent in the short term, will likely join his most ideologically consistent party UNLESS, he thinks their initials next to his name will prevent him from getting enough votes.

But they think they are centrists, and uninformed centrists believe them.

"The middle road will not be feminine..."

It will include aspects of it though. It has been defining masculinity in opposition to femininity for all these years which has allowed a toxic aspect to develop within male dominated groups over time.

The only reason I fear revolution is because I fear if my side wins, we'll govern peacetime as we would during war.

Really becomes hard to judge who your allies are when things get ugly, and there are way too many covert narcissists that know how to game their way to control.

A planned state economy isn't a leftist ideal.

Leftism does its best to tear down hierarchies, tankies have a problem with the way economics are handled, and the existing hierarchies, but that's only because they want to be the ones in charge of both.