Yep, going after accusers should be something that only happens in extreme cases, like the accused being able to prove they weren't even in the same State at the time or in some other way being impossible for them to have committed the act.
Do you think the people are not part of the government?
You have zero empathy. I feel bad for your patients.
Man gotta love when those protesters storm the local grocery store to fight social injustice. BLM!
No, they are arguing that everything is technically technology. So we should turn this community into a basket weaving forum.
"Google invents a new standard" is very different from "Google CEO does a big dumb dumb"
Yeah, still doesn't belong here though.
Oh shit, I've owned them for less than a year now so haven't seen that yet. Thanks for the heads up will check them out.
I don't think people accept it happening in a male character, in both cases it makes for a bad movie. The term woke is just so politically charged it doesn't really apply to when it is a male character.
Why is it woke when female or “minority” characters are this way but not when white male characters are this way?
Not OP but both are bad movies for the same reason, the term woke just only applies to those that seem to have been made this way to promote some idea that minority women are amazing and white men suck. That's just how the term woke evolved since it's a politically charged term.
And how is Galadriel not the way she is described in the original IP?
I don't know much about this but is this the dwarf queen who was supposed to have a beard but didn't? If so then yeah definitely not as described in the original IP. If not, well yeah no idea then.
I feel like it might be because those movies contain a lot more than just that.
Fucking calvin klein microfiber boxers made me a changed man. Expensive shit though.
... I mean ... idk ... If the argument is that the drawn version doesn't harm kids and gives pedos an outlet, is a ai generated version any different?
There's a huge difference between a "book burning" and "burning a single book"
Yes, my point is that they aren't the same bottle.
The thought process assumes it is a complete and perfect cloning of all aspects we do and don't understand. The reason the clone is not you is because if I do something to the clone it does not affect you.
Like if you take a water bottle and clone it, drinking one does not cause the other to be empty. Thus they must be two separate things.
Because there being two real yous doesn't make sense. Like you can have two identical things but they can not be the same thing, there must be a you #1 and a you #2. Like if I have two water bottles, they are two identical things but they are not the same thing. Changing one of them does not affect the other, thus they are not the same thing.