Deebster @ Deebster @programming.dev

New account since lemmyrs.org went down, other `@Deebster`s are available.

---

Read more

Posts

57

Comments

956

Joined

2 yr. ago

        // this is bollocks, delete it

  

That's almost certainly from a Brit.

            // this looks like I'm being a fancy arsehole, but this is all because  
    // the window shows up white for some reason when first opened, and this  
    // disguises it.

  

Could be either.

chefkiss.png

Legends!

Tragic Titan sounds like an Ubuntu version.

The article shows that that's not what's going on:

YouTube, which is owned by Google, confirmed to The Intercept that it deleted the groups’ accounts as a direct result of State Department sanctions against the group after a review. The Trump administration leveled the sanctions against the organizations in September over their work with the International Criminal Court in cases charging Israeli officials of war crimes.

“Google is committed to compliance with applicable sanctions and trade compliance laws,” YouTube spokesperson Boot Bullwinkle said in a statement.

Did you read the article or just the headline?

This is particularly pleasing. The sunset gives me synthwave vibes.

That's a good point, but a few decades of talking to clients has led to a number of conversations like this where they want it to "just work", even if they've input the wrong information.

I solved it in 1️⃣8️⃣ moves!
⭐ ⭐ ⭐ 🦊 🦔 🎉

@TheTurner@lemmy.zip the permanent link for this puzzle is https://www.merriam-webster.com/games/reunion/47 (you can find it from the archive tab).

REUNION October 17, 2025

I solved it in 1️⃣5️⃣ moves!
⭐ ⭐ ⭐ 🦊 🦔 🎉

And then the other guy reverted that... eatingpopcorn.gif

!showerthoughts@lemmy.world needs to up its game

They die for a variety of reasons, including disease, pollution, heat waves, etc. Not being half starved of essential nutrients means that they're more resilient.

From the article:

[Unaffiliated expert] said: "[...] bees face many stressors. Good nutrition is one way to improve their resilience to these threats, and in landscapes with dwindling natural forage for bees, a more complete diet supplement could be a game changer. This breakthrough discovery of key phytonutrients that, when included in feed supplements, allow sustained honey bee brood rearing has immense potential to improve outcomes for colony survival, and in turn the beekeeping businesses we rely on for our food production."

Your second sentence is your own thoughts, not part of the tldr summary, right? I think you should make that separation clear (in Wikipedia terms, I'm flagging this as "original research").

You'd recommend Heroic launcher over Lutris? Epic didn't install via Lutris for me, but I haven't got around to looking into it.

I've never played that either, but I love Metroidvanias so I assume it's great.

I picked up the Mass Effect trilogy recently following a tip from here (I think).

Can you also fly them at 90°? I'm thinking about flags like Japan 🇯🇵 where is the same or the UK 🇬🇧 where most couldn't tell.

Recently while troubleshooting I've found a lot of deleted comments with dozens of people saying thanks, often for years afterwards. Reddit annoyed their most valuable posters and we're all paying for it.

Making encryption cheaper to implement for IoT stuff is definitely a good thing, although bugs that won't ever be patched will likely continue to be the main problem.

Defcon 33 just finished with no news about a backdoor (remember Dual_EC_DRBG), so that's nice.

It's equivalent because UNION removes duplicates; the behaviour you're describing happens with UNION ALL. Since both queries are article.*, both halves will have the same columns and the dedupe will be successful.

UNION is less efficient because of this deduplication, but it's the default since that's what most people want. If that matters then you'd be correct that a JOIN version will be more efficient (possibly depending on indexes present and sql engine).

That won't show if results are equivalent, only if the query plans are matching, which they won't be (at least before the SQL engine's optimisations).

There aren't any joins in either query (and only one table involved), so that quoted bit of documentation isn't relevant.

Order aside, the two results would be identical In the same way that 2(4 + 3) = 2×4 + 2×3