Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)CO
Posts
5
Comments
3,099
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • Conservation is a neat subject. If you learn just a little bit, it'll become clear there's one amount of lobster in the world for everyone. It'd be good to work together. Once. Maybe for this.

    A constitutional challenge against a country they do not recognize? Explain how that works.

  • I dunno. My research lab is a small room in my house, so have to lean on the research of so many universities. It's carefully balanced out - teach both sides of the cash cow, right? - by groups on behalf of impoverished cities and equipment vendors; I just don't know whom to trust.

    https://amp.star-telegram.com/news/state/texas/article216364010.html

    https://www.digitaltrends.com/cars/red-light-camera-controversy/

    Careful with your own references. There's a lot out there both for and against the idea, all the research and data seems woefully biased, and it's only all the victims to blame.

  • I bet to differ. We've gone with the other carrier whenever we can because AC has been just so comically bad and apathetic since almost the 1900s (and I love saying it like that).

    But, once a year when #reasons dictate, we buck up and fly AC ... and then we reaffirm our fleeting vow to never again.

    This is just one of the many situations when I dearly wish to be proved wrong. But, it's like a sergeant once said: "Don't change, [soldier]; I've a BET riding on you!"

  • Red light cameras cause more rear-ender accidents. The numbers are there. They're just a cash grab.

    Speed cameras don't stop speeders. They're just a slimy cash grab.

    Kudos for relabeling them as 'traffic safety cameras' . It reduces the people thinking critically and makes it sound oh, so good for the people.

  • It's not going to happen. Our world has grown too simple to uderstand the nuance of "maybe killing 5x as many kids in retaliation for killing kids is also bad", and people will say "yes but" as if anything can make that sound justifiable instead of one deplorable war crime after another from people who know better.

    Our opposition party holding this person up as a scapegoat was just preordained. And now she's toxic.

  • want what's best for their families, friends, neighbours, and the country.

    Okay, so caring for one another is in and the blue party is out.

    Saving money through consolidation and single-payer services? Again, blue's out. Orange has it here but can't get into power without vote reform and the courage it gives us to vote our hearts.

    One's obligation to friends, family, and the country, directly proportional to one's income, so our most at-risk can focus on improvement? Blues still out. This seems to be a red thing.

    I don't know whether there's enough there to get a new party. Who's convinced you that one of the existing ones are no good; and tell us which blue it was too.