What, Bluesky shouldn't be let into the fediverse, or Bluesky shouldn't let Threads in?
I don't see any problem with Bluesky. They've got a decent philosophy and approach, tbh.
Sure, for people who pay attention and / or care. But sadly I think the real comparison with be:
Ease to get started:
Mastodon - Learn what a server is, find a server, create an account.
Threads - Just download it. You probably already have an account without realising.
It's going to do well.
Sure, it's mostly going to be celebs, brands and 'content creators' but that'll still mean a lot of people. And folks will go where the people are.
Personally, I'm hoping BlueSky just dish out 10 invites per user and bring in people to that infrastructure. It looks like a good middle ground between fediverse and simple Twitter experience.
Yeah, I'm still there. I'm not letting the right-wing trolls win. I'm there until it implodes.
Much like Reddit, if you curate your feed, stay away from the big accounts and avoid the Trending Topics and don't talk politics then it's still a decent place to be.
I still don't think a game has used fire as effectively as this did, before or since. Even in later Far Cry games seem to have a much more fire-lite implementation.
I got a little bit too excited about roundabouts. "Ooh, they'll be so useful!". I know we kind of had them in the first game, but only really as huge junctions. I want to build Milton Keynes.