Both UnraidFS and mergerFS can merge drives of separate types and sizes into one array. They also allow removing / adding drives without disturbing the array. None of this is possible with traditional RAID (or at least not without a significant time sink for re-making the array), no matter the type of RAID you use.
Correct me if im wrong, but if you play a 1080p video on a 4k screen, that would be upscaled. If you put a 1080p video in a 4K stream, then play that 4k stream on the 4k screen, no post-processing would be applied to the video on the screen. All the upscaling happens during encoding, where you have far more control over the upscaler quality.
Because using a containerization system to run multiple services on the same machine is vastly superior to running everything bare metal? Both from a security and a ease-of-use standpoint. Why wouldnt you use docker?
Caddy and Authentik play very nicely together thanks to caddy forward_auth directive. Regarding acls, you'll have to read some documentation, but it shouldnt be difficult to figure out whatsoever. The documentation and forum are great sources of info.
Just use yt-dlp instead of relying on websites that shove ads in your face and may do what ever they want to the files you're downloading?
AdGuard Home supports static clients. Unless the instance is being used over TCP (port 53, unencrypted), it is by far the better way to use clientnames in the DNS server addresses and unblock the clients over that.
For DoT: clientname.dns.yourdomain.com
For DoH: https://dns.yourdomain.com/dns-query/clientname
A client, especially a mobile one, can simply not guarantee always having the same IP address.
If you dont fear using a little bit of terminal, caddy imo is the better choice. It makes SSL even more brainless (since its 100% automatic), is very easy to configure (especially for reverse proxying) yet very powerful if you need it, has a wonderful documentation and an extensive extension library, doesnt require a mysql database that eats 200 MB RAM and does not have unnecessary limitations due to UI abstractions. There are many more advantages to caddy over NPM. I have not looked back since I switched.
An example caddyfile for reverse proxying to a docker container from a hostname, with automatic SSL certificates, automatic websockets and all the other typical bells and whistles:
https://yourdomain.com {
reverse_proxy radarr:7878
}
The demo instance would be their commercial service I suppose: https://ente.io/. Since, as are their own words, the github code 1:1 represents the code running on their own servers, the result when selfhosting should be identical.
Theres a Dockerfile that you can use for building. It barely changes the flow of how you setup the container. Bigger issue imo is that it literally is the code they use for their premium service, meaning that all the payment stuff is in there. And I don't know if the apps even have support for connecting to a custom instance.
Edit: their docs state that the apps all support custom instances, making this more intruiging
The settlement addresses any and all people who were ever involved in any fashion with the production or distribution of yuzu. Quoting the Settlement:
against Defendant enjoining it and its members, agents, servants, employees, independent contractors, successors, assigns, and all those acting in privity or under its control
So yeah, the devs are all individually targeted, not just the LLC as its own entity. And if any of the devs is ever caught doing anything like this again, they're gonna face charges much more serious than this i fear.
If anyone is interested in reading the actual settlement: https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.rid.56980/gov.uscourts.rid.56980.10.1.pdf
Is location the only reason to not use it as the AP? If I had a larger house I'd agree, but as I live in a small apartment, the current router location can easily serve the entire flat, so that is no concern right now.
Ive wanted one of these for a while to replace my ISPs modem+router+switch+wifi-AP. But apparently these devices can be funky to get a good wifi going, and I don't feel like adding three (mini pc, switch, AP) new devices to my "we don't talk about it" corner where all the IT is stored. Do you know anything about wifi on these?
You can docker compose up -d to (re)create only one service from your Dockerfile
I'll plug another subsonic compatible server here: gonic. It does not have a web player ui, which saves on RAM. And it is really fast too.
It supports sharing via public link. But I don't think it has sharing with registered users via username.
this image does not look real at all. why does the bear look so badly photoshopped into the image? something about the light, the shadows, the proportions, feels entirely off to me. the resolutions of the ocean/ice and the bear dont match at all. or is that just me?
@selfhosted@lemmy.world
Mid 2022, a friend of mine helped me set up a selfhosted Vaultwarden instance. Since then, my "infrastructure" has not stopped growing, and I've been learning each and every day about how services work, how they communicate and how I can move data from one place to another. It's truly incredible, and my favorite hobby by a long shot.
Here's a map of what I've built so far. Right now, I'm mostly done, but surely time will bring more ideas. I've also left out a bunch of "technically revelant" connections like DNS resolution through the AdGuard instance, firewalls and CrowdSec on the main VPS.
Looking at the setups that others have posted, I don't think this is super incredible - but if you have input or questions about the setup, I'll do my best to explain it all. None of my peers really understand what it takes to construct something like this, so I am in need of people who understand my excitement and proudness :)
Edit: the image was compressed a bit too much, so here's the full res image for the curious: https://files.catbox.moe/iyq5vx.png And a dark version for the night owls: https://files.catbox.moe/hy713z.png
Hello SelfHosters! After getting myself a wonderfully large NAS and spending a couple days thinking about how to link up the different services, I turn to you for advice. This is my situation:
I've been operating a cheap VPS for a while now, which runs a bunch of services that require neither lots of storage nor compute (webserver, vaultwarden, gitea and so on). But I refuse to pay the price for a large capacity / powerful remote machine for stuff like Jellyfin or Immich, especially because I want these things to be available to me in the local network no matter the network state (internet drops frequently here). Therefor, I've setup a ~50TB NAS, on which I want to both store and backup larger data packets, as well as operate some storage/traffic heavy applications (Jellyfin, Immich, Nextcloud, ...).
What I'm struggling with is the networking of things. My VPS sits behind a Cloudflare Proxy, and I like it that way. All services are managed via domains and accessible from anywhere via that. I neither want nor need isolation of these services by a VPN. I want to continue this way with the new homelab, but am unable to directly expose ports on my home connection, or to get a static IP. For additional complication, traffic from these data-heavy applications cannot run through Cloudflare due to their limitations on the free plan. Finally, in a perfect world, I would be able to manage the domain names for services on the Homelab in the Nginx Container on the VPS, so that everything is centralized and I don't have separate management interfaces.
My first idea was to connect the VPS and the Homelab with a Wireguard tunnel, but since this would route traffic through Cloudflare, it wouldn't work.
I then read about Tailscale, and that I could link up the Homelab and VPS in a tailnet, setting up the node on the VPS as subnet router for the docker network on the homelab, which would bring me to something along these lines:
!network layout with a direct connection
In a perfect world, the Nginx container on the VPS would be able to seemlessly direct traffic to both services running on the VPS and the Homelab, and data coming from the homelab would be routed directly to the client, while VPS data would continue running through Cloudflare. This would work without the client having to connect to any VPNs or mesh networks, the domain name would have to be enough.
Maybe I'm overcomplicating things. Please don't feel obligated to copy-paste guides, I'll happily read external ressources that you can recommend. I'll also provide clarifications in the comments as needed. Any pointers how you people solve this would be much appreciated.
