I'm always open to hear both sides of the argument on UAP origins and the research that goes into it, but approach it with some respect. The article is filled with dismissive claims like Avi Loeb researching "some tiny blobs", belittles statements from David Grusch by stating "But basically, we’re talking saucers." and calls him "just this guy Grusch". Nearly every paragraph has some childish, dismissive claims. For an article in the "Intelligencer" section of New York Mag, it reads like a middle school essay.
Then why would nasa and the pentagon say they have?
I'm always open to hear both sides of the argument on UAP origins and the research that goes into it, but approach it with some respect. The article is filled with dismissive claims like Avi Loeb researching "some tiny blobs", belittles statements from David Grusch by stating "But basically, we’re talking saucers." and calls him "just this guy Grusch". Nearly every paragraph has some childish, dismissive claims. For an article in the "Intelligencer" section of New York Mag, it reads like a middle school essay.