ICANN proposes creating .INTERNAL domain to do the same job as 192.168.x.x
ICANN proposes creating .INTERNAL domain to do the same job as 192.168.x.x
www.theregister.com
ICANN proposes creating .INTERNAL domain
12 comments
-
-
What about all the other weird TLDs that aren't being used? Like .walmart
I would have thought that Walmart.walmart would be a valid link but it isn't, so what's the point?!
12 comments
Don’t we already have .local for that?
https://community.veeam.com/blogs-and-podcasts-57/why-using-local-as-your-domain-name-extension-is-a-bad-idea-4828
Is 192.168.x.x not reserved for local networks? I’m pretty sure it isn’t used for public addresses. That link specifically says don’t use .local for public dns, use it for local mdns.