It's ba-ack... UK watchdog publishes age verification proposals
It's ba-ack... UK watchdog publishes age verification proposals
Won't somebody think of the children?
In 2022, Daniel Pryor, then head of research at the Adam Smith Institute think tank, warned that any tech-savvy teen would likely be able to circumvent restrictions, while adults entering their details stood every chance of being exposed in the event of a data breach.
Can't believe the Tories have got me agreeing with the Adam Smith Institute.
Pretty sure the last thing anyone wants to do is upload a picture of their face to a porn site…
Imagine working as a porn age vertivicator
Well some people want to do it or porn wouldn't exist
People! You missed the joke!
"Ofcom also states that sites must not provide information about or links to Virtual Private Network (VPN) providers." That's every other YouTuber fucked then.
That’s also just impressively authoritarian. Banning the tools of dissent to “protect children from porn”
Let’s be honest, that’s what it’s really about. Controlling the flow of dissent and information on the internet, so that the despicables can continue robbing us and fucking us over.
We need age verification for social media more than we do for porn
It's sad that we need to pretend to be french to have equal internet freedom in the UK.
That's how they get you - the French are too busy making le sweet sweet amour to watch porn. Probably. Better to pretend to be Dutch or German.
Digital identity wallets and, our favorite, facial age estimation, where the features of a user's face are analyzed to estimate the user's age.
Well that could be "fun". Poor George Dawes - he's just a big baby.
Ah yes, facial analysis, someday people will stop thinking this is even possible to get to the error rates they want
Requiring age verification for porn is such a stupid idea. Firstly, what's the definition of "porn"? Should people be blocked from looking at Michelangelo's David? Where precisely is the line between what's porn and what isn't, and why should anybody have the right to impose that? Secondly, it's unenforceable. On any website where people can submit content, they can submit porn that children might see. Should we block them all, then? That goes for all social media. It goes for anywhere people can leave comments/reviews. It goes for every basket-weaving forum. Since it's obviously impossible to make a dent, why bother at all? And what about Google Images? What about sites with generative AI? Websites aren't the only porn on the Internet either. I torrented porn when I was 13. Discord exists. Video games exist. What's stopping people just making their own and sharing it? Absolutely boneheaded idea. It's so stupid, that it makes me think the real reason is more nefarious, and "saving the children" is just propaganda.
I think the propaganda is the nefarious reason.
Tories have been talking about this since at least the coalition, if they had really wanted to impliment something like this they would've. The fact they haven't implies:
- They don't actually want it. Judging on recent scandals any chaste puritans in the tory party are so far in the back benches as to be blind to any goings on up front.
- They want to keep talking about it. See also: immigration. They know they have shit policies in every other area, so they need 'vote winners' among their core demographic (50 and over). Hence: save the kids, stop the boats, shag the flag. Labour and Lib-dems are never going to be able to present themselves as credible in these areas because of their historical leanings, so the tories don't actually need to back up their promises with any actual 'progress' on these issues.
Reddit is full of it, or so I'm told, and there's a few NSFW Lemmy communities out there, allegedly.
I'll have to make sure I keep an eye out for them so that I can avoid them.
That's a good point. I was dating a girl who said her ex would only get off of feet. Feet fetish is kinda huge (i think) so feet IS someone's porn, while for other people it's just feet, or more so just gross.
Reminds me of this YouTube channel (@Flocflocus), where a guy soaks himself in water while clothed. It's not explicitly sexual, but I'd be surprised if it wasn't a fetish.
This is the best summary I could come up with:
However, service providers will likely be stuck between a rock and a hard place in implementing the guidance without also falling foul of privacy regulations.
It doesn't take a genius to imagine how a determined teenager might circumvent many of these restrictions, nor the potential privacy nightmare inherent in many of them if an adult is forced to share this level of info when accessing age-restricted sites.
In 2022, the UK government threatened the requirement of handing over all range of personal data to access social media sites.
The previous time around, the idea of allowing certain firms to work as information collaters / age verification service providers was floated, with critics correctly surmising this would create huge jackpot targets of citizen data.
In 2022, Daniel Pryor, then head of research at the Adam Smith Institute think tank, warned that any tech-savvy teen would likely be able to circumvent restrictions, while adults entering their details stood every chance of being exposed in the event of a data breach.
"Regardless of their approach, we expect all services to offer robust protection to children from stumbling across pornography, and also to take care that privacy rights and freedoms for adults to access legal content are safeguarded."
The original article contains 561 words, the summary contains 204 words. Saved 64%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!
If they actually do this then a list of people watching will be hacked within days and will quite strongly backfire on MPs...
Ludicrous, authoritarian, outdated bullshit.