Also, all numbers are rational, otherwise they do not make sense
what about the number whose square is -1
Roses are red, Euhler's a hero, e^iπ+1=0
You're just imagining it
as far as the rationals are concerned, this is the same as the number whose square is 2. (ℚ(i) and ℚ(√2) are isomorphic as fields.)
what we can gleam from this is that complete rationality can blur the line between what’s real and what’s imaginary
Someone needs to hit you with a dose of reality
But Pythagoras hated triangles with irrational hypotenuses. A triangle with leg lengths of 3 and 4 units? Beautiful. A triangle with two 1 unit legs? Die
And not a right triangle in sight. I forget, did Pythagoras develop Pythagorean theorem or the law of sines?
"Every tryangle...", says man holding a prisma
That's not a prism, it's a tetrahedron, the most triangular of the solids!
