this is just low quality content trying to grab a few clicks. it should be removed.
65 0 ReplyThat website has always been like this. They occasionally publish articles and I sometimes visit them for curiosity but more often than not, many articles are sheer garbage.
Oh, it seems like they also started their own membership thing. Wow!
3 0 Reply
IMO:
- Arch Wiki
- Gentoo Wiki
- Your distro's wiki
- Your DE/WM's wiki
- Documentation, bug tracker, etc. of things that you use on a regular basis
- Some people's who use similar things to you dotfiles
23 0 ReplyYeah but which only fans pages should I follow as a Linux user
12 0 Reply
Imagine recommended reddit on "itsfoss".
22 0 Reply-1 for recommending r/Linux
+1 for recommending DistroWatch
17 0 ReplyNo.
14 0 ReplyAdd in regexr as well
10 0 Replyregex101 also excellent
5 0 Reply
'should have' -- but didn't? What happened then?
10 0 ReplyI had that moment too but I think this is actually intended as "should keep bookmarked".
3 0 ReplyYeah, I'm sure that was the intention; but the wording is off, so I wanted to take a little jibe at it.
2 0 Reply
It's prefectly reasonable to say "I have that site bookmarked".
Then go to "I should have that site bookmarked".
"I'll check on that one site I should have bookmarked"
Etc.
1 0 Reply
But I didn't bookmark them, so where do we go from here? The judgy tone isn't helping.
9 0 ReplyThe intro is a little less proscriptive: “ Here's the list of my favorite Linux websites. Perhaps you'll like them too.”
3 0 ReplyAre you getting offended from a listicle title?
2 0 Reply
https://www.omgubuntu.co.uk has some decent new and app update news here and there, and other generalized release news for various other distros aside from Ubuntu.
6 0 Replyat least they don't toot their own horn
2 0 ReplyI highly recommend LWN.net.
2 0 Reply