this is just low quality content trying to grab a few clicks. it should be removed.
That website has always been like this. They occasionally publish articles and I sometimes visit them for curiosity but more often than not, many articles are sheer garbage.
Oh, it seems like they also started their own membership thing. Wow!
IMO:
- Arch Wiki
- Gentoo Wiki
- Your distro's wiki
- Your DE/WM's wiki
- Documentation, bug tracker, etc. of things that you use on a regular basis
- Some people's who use similar things to you dotfiles
Yeah but which only fans pages should I follow as a Linux user
Imagine recommended reddit on "itsfoss".
-1 for recommending r/Linux
+1 for recommending DistroWatch
No.
Add in regexr as well
regex101 also excellent
'should have' -- but didn't? What happened then?
I had that moment too but I think this is actually intended as "should keep bookmarked".
Yeah, I'm sure that was the intention; but the wording is off, so I wanted to take a little jibe at it.
It's prefectly reasonable to say "I have that site bookmarked".
Then go to "I should have that site bookmarked".
"I'll check on that one site I should have bookmarked"
Etc.
But I didn't bookmark them, so where do we go from here? The judgy tone isn't helping.
The intro is a little less proscriptive: “ Here's the list of my favorite Linux websites. Perhaps you'll like them too.”
Are you getting offended from a listicle title?
https://www.omgubuntu.co.uk has some decent new and app update news here and there, and other generalized release news for various other distros aside from Ubuntu.
at least they don't toot their own horn
I highly recommend LWN.net.
