Britain on Thursday told local government councils in England to end any trials of a four-day working week for their employees, saying the idea does not offer taxpayers good value for money.
The scheme, where staff have their working hours cut by 20% while keeping their existing salary, has been adopted by some businesses which argue it improves work-life balance without damaging productivity.
Reality and facts don't matter to conservatives, only how they feel about something. They feel people should be worked harder. So these trials are getting shelved.
At one point in my career I had a 4-day week and let me tell you that it was glorious. Instead of barely having time on the weekend to recover from the eat-work-sleep daily grind, I actually had some time to feel human again and even spend some money on a hobby. A hobby!
At one point I had every other Friday off and even having the three day weekend only every other week was really refreshing and such a nice break. I miss it, I've been hoping it becomes more common.
I'll never go back to anything more than a three day week. And if I had to feed on gruel only, I'd never accept this kind work ethic being forced on me again.
LONDON, Oct 26 (Reuters) - Britain on Thursday told local government councils in England to end any trials of a four-day working week for their employees, saying the idea does not offer taxpayers good value for money.
The scheme, where staff have their working hours cut by 20% while keeping their existing salary, has been adopted by some businesses which argue it improves work-life balance without damaging productivity.
"The government is being crystal clear that it does not support the adoption of the four-day working week within the local government sector," Britain's minister for local government Lee Rowley said in a statement.
"Local authorities that are considering adopting it should not do so.
Those who have adopted it already should end those practice immediately."
The government said it supported the right of individual employees to request flexible working, such as changes to their hours or location of work, but "removing 20% of a local authority's potential capacity does not offer value for money for residents".
The original article contains 165 words, the summary contains 165 words. Saved 0%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!
I love this bot, it's always so honest. Like it would be really easy for the dev to put in a threshold for posting, like "if compression < 20%, skip post". But nope, here it is basking naked, in all its glory, good or bad.
I once saw it post a negative savings -- was due to an html entity hiding throughout the article that got counted as one char in the original, but as multiple in the summary.
I really hope they'll never ever reduce public offices opening times in my country (which are still reduced are the pandemic). The bureaucracy is already not working due high levels of inefficiency, corruption and absenteeism. It'll be a nightmare.
I'm from 🇮🇹🍕🤌 needless to say
In a serious country that's true, but we are "creative". Online platforms are unavailable and offices still with reduced schedules due to "contagion". Trying to obtain a passport or even an ID is a nightmare.