Anon finds a glitch in the modern dating system
Anon finds a glitch in the modern dating system
Anon finds a glitch in the modern dating system
They had fun together, but she didn't go all the way because they were family.
Well, he said it worked 10 times, and 85% of the time. He may mean it worked 10 out of 12 attempts and is rounding up from 83.3%
But let's be honest, he probably hadn't even attempted it once.
Homie did the math!
That’s the one we call the Boebert.
It worked, but turned out to be a guy. Still had a good time though
The date pulled out the same crap so each had half a point.
Their hands instead.
He's starting a business lah!
I'd rather die than be this desperate and immoral.
Perfect green text!
This is basically how a romance scam works but without the asking for money part
How does the math work that they did it 10x with 85% working?
Also wtf gaslighting. This is a whole new level of negging
I know right? It's almost like people lie on the internet.
That's not gaslighting. It's catfishing. Gaslighting is when you try to trick someone into thinking they're crazy or that their memory is unreliable by lying to them about events you both experienced or knew about.
people love to use new words they've learnt even when they've misunderstood what they actually mean. Funnily enough, that comment has been upvoted 83 times, showing that the majority of people are either fine in using terms in wrong context or are also not aware of the correct term.
It's not even cat fishing cuz he's not pretending to be the matched person
The Dennis System is the only way!
It worked 10 times. We can guess he tried 12 times with 2 fails, 10/12 rounds up to 85%.
The only believable part is at the beginning where 30 women didn't go on a date with someone who uses 4chan after talking to them.
Remember to turn off notification sounds 😉
How can you do it 10 times and have an 85% success rate?
Maybe just a handy, so counts it as half
Maybe one of the times he failed outright and another time he only got to 2nd base
Why is wanting a person with money even in the same ballpark of bad as lying to people to get them into bed?
Just because I don't understand or share the preference of someone doesn't mean I want them to get used like a fleshlight.
Is it seriously your opinion that a person wanting someone with money is a bad human being who deserves to be treated like what your workmate did?
This is simply misogyny. And people are ultra casual about it. That's seriously scary. I wonder what other partner preferences you think makes women basically lose their right to be treated with a baseline of respect.
I'm like 90% sure this features in Barney Stinson's playbook lmfao
I'm wondering what 85% of something that worked 10 times is.
8.5, probably a blowjob.
One time he only got an unenthusiastic handjob in the bar toilets
60% of the time, it works every time.
I'm going to be honest with you. That smells like pure gasoline.
I think the term here is 'chadfishing.'
There are people who allegedly do stuff like this on Tinder, but it's mainly to push the incel narrative that you need a strong square jawline, huge chin, and other masculine features to even have a chance to match with ladies on Tinder.
Or course people claiming this could easily have faked screenshots, so take that with a massive grain of salt.
well it is a pretty shallow app.
being good looking helps. I've done tinder as a fat guy and as a fit guy (legitimately, i lost a load of weight for a while) and i got a lot more attention when i was fitter.
Evil if true
He’s not breaking the rules, just bending it a little bit
He's a fucking asshole when real that hopefully gets some real syphilis from one of his encounters.
I think there's a friends episode with this as the plot
Can you narrow it down some?
So he tried it ten times and it worked 8 times and a half time?
Maybe he only got to second base.
"The rattle is driving me crazy"
A fat exhaust makes fat smoke.
Why do I feel promiscuity is disgusting? I have no connection to a stupid religion, neither do I care about social standards in that regard. Am I old fashioned or uptight? But since I was a teenager I despise it to the point I had the opportunity and said no, several times (when I was younger, I'm around 40 now) My buddies always said i'm stupid asf, I don't know. Am I? Got 2 girlfriends in my life, the last one now for 20 years (still going), all my experience you can count on one hand, I don't feel inhibited in my "skills", at least what the feedback tells me, but on the other hand there's clearly a bias, idk.
Whether you are more or less sociosexual (the scientific term) is partly genetic and partly environmental (and by that I mean more how your parents behave than whether or not you belong to a religion). It is completely normal to be turned off by promiscuity because you value a deeper connection.
I wonder if it's because you associate the concept of promiscuity with the behaviours and attitudes of people who treat sex as a trophy and a bragging right.
There's a big difference between someone who likes what they like and does it when they can in their own bedroom, and someone who uses manipulative tactics to have as much sex as they can and brag about it as though that makes them a winner at something, acting superior.
Growing up in a society that reinforces that behaviour (specifically, in men) has probably meant that the two concepts are linked, and your feelings towards one are the same as the other.
I'm a certified slut and that type of "sex as a conquest" behaviour feels gross to me too, and if that was the only way to have casual sex, I'd never have casual sex ever again, even though I like sex.
I think because I'm not a man, it was easier for me to separate the two concepts. If anything, I was shamed for promiscuity, so it helped me to explore what's right for me with an attitude of "who cares what society thinks about my sex life".
Basically, if OP has sex and doesn't brag about it, did he still enjoy it? Because sometimes I think guys like this don't enjoy the sex for the sex, they want it for the status. And that's whack.
Humans are animals, they have sex. There should be no stigma on it, like you're having. Do you see monkeys shame each other for fucking right in front of each other? If people want to have sex, they will have sex, and if you don't want that, fine. But don't ever judge anyone for their choice.
Probably because most promiscuous people use people like objects, like Anon.
To be fair, there is a fun, consenting way to do so. Anon's way ain't it though.
I am with you on this point. I never believed in sex just for the sake of sex, without any deeper connection. Although lately I have been having doubts about being so un-promiscuous. Oh well, some things you will never know. At least I’m glad I’m not the only “fool” out there
Interesting. Counterpoint, anon's a dick for manipulating people like that.
Counter to what? That is the point.
Exactly
Arguing a 4chan post was actually not just brain dead ramblings of a pathological liar was your first mistake
Shh don’t question the status quo bro. You don’t wanna do that bro.
Definitely don’t bring up how men doing this is traditionally seen as manipulative immediately but when anyone other than cis males do it, it’s just a silly little play ha ha he he ho ho
If the dude was getting 60 matches in two months he was already doing quite good for himself, no? Pretty sure that is above average.
Also how can he have done this 10 times but gotten laid 8.5 times?
He probably meant he was successful 10 times, so he must have tried 11.7647 times.
tinder is a narcissist honey pot
Wouldn't it be funny when he could not recognize the woman because she used a fake image, too?
10 times. 85%. Afraid of the half one.
Bro
Red pill anon.
The red pill is estrogen.
I've posted this green text 20 times and people fall for it 73.6% of the time
5 out of 7 statistics are made up on the spot.
oh damn, a perfect score
Aren’t fantasies fun?
He's so smart, tricking silly women into having sex with him in his mind.
Hahaha broads are so gullible.
But not smart enough to pick a percentage that divides evenly by 10.
What kind of robot thinks "hey are you waiting for someone" sounds like a normal thing to ask a person?
You've been watching this person for half an hour, you pick up certain cues, like they being alone and waiting instead of making an order.