Canon is wrong, dragonborn have tails
69 0 Replythe official canon states that tieflings can't be purple, and yet the official artwork for a tiefling is a purple tiefling
82 0 ReplyPossibly the most ignored sentence in the PHB, even by Wotc themselves:
Their skin tones cover the full range of human coloration, but also include various shades of red.
42 0 ReplyOfficial Dragonborn PHB description say Dragonborns are brown/rust coloured, with some being rust-copper green.
Artwork on the same page is a red scaled dragonborn.
34 0 Reply
This was settled years ago
39 0 ReplyTROGDOR THE BURNINATOR!
14 0 Reply
Another image I can hear thanks to Bill Wurtz.
21 0 ReplyI recognize that the council has made a decision, but given that it's a stupid-ass decision i've elected to ignore it.
15 0 ReplySpeaking as a person playing a soot-black tiefling...
13 0 ReplyThis is the real reason I stopped playing D&D. The OGL stuff was just a smoke screen.
10 0 ReplyYou want a tail, play a Kobold!
6 0 ReplyWhy are Japan and Korea the same color on this map? 🤨
6 0 ReplyIt's a screen cap from a video talking about Japan's involvement in World War 2, where they invaded Korea.
22 0 ReplyThe video for those who are curious. Absolutely worth the 20 minutes.
3 0 Reply
Erm, tails are based, ofc my pc has one!
2 0 Reply