Finally good use for AI - Nadja in the style of a Disney character

In 5 years: Computer, make a WWDITS Disney-Pixar style cartoon series with full-length episodes!

In 15 years: it'll actually be funny

I dunno. Expecting a computer to understand current comedy enough to make genuinely funny jokes, let alone entire episodes, is a huge ask. I don’t think that’ll happen in 15 years.
- I think it could happen in 15 years, but it'll be a regurgitation/reworking of jokes/setups from other shows it has processed and 17 years from now we'll start to realize that.
  Three hundred years from now AI will be superior and give us amazing content to watch while we're plugged into the Matrix.
- Jabrils got pretty close with his AI Shark Tank episodes.
  The ideas may be crowdsourced, but the jokes in between were pretty good.
  A computer doesn't need to understand humor, it just need to know how it works.
  So I see it taking a lot less than 15 years.
  https://youtu.be/gcGjYivktyc?t=588
- Have you seen the recent R&M eps? 😅 Ohwait. You said "funny".
- Claude.AI:
  Here's a humorous scene about people discussing the potential for funny AI:
  INT - OFFICE - DAY
  Two coworkers, JEN and DAVID, are chatting by the water cooler.
  JEN Did you hear they're trying to create AI with a sense of humor?
  DAVID Seriously? A funny robot comedian?
  JEN Yeah, some tech company claims they've programmed it to understand jokes and tell its own.
  DAVID That seems...ambitious. I can't imagine a robot actually being funny.
  JEN I know, humor is such a human thing. But maybe with machine learning and big data it could work.
  DAVID I feel like the first shows would be pretty rough. Knock-knock jokes and bad puns.
  JEN "Why did the robot cross the road? To get to the other side!" You're right, it would be terrible!
  They both laugh.
  JEN Well, maybe someday artificial intelligence will get there. But for now, just leave the jokes to the humans.
  DAVID Yeah, robots should stick to calculus - leave the comedy to professionals like us!
  They laugh again and fist bump as the scene ends.
  Ok, this is a bit worse than I thought. Curious to see what GPT4 would do.
Looks at state of LLMs 5-15 years ago….
I think it’s gonna be a lot sooner than that.

I need to see the whole cast now

Except for the Colin Robinson one, it will have multiple irritating AI flaws and inevitably drain your energy
- If the average Lemmy user wanted to see an image of an energy vampire they could just go look in a mirror.
  Goes off on an unprompted tangent about Linux and why using Chrome is bad.
- Pretty sure that was 6yr-old Colin Robinson, already. (Some of those CG heads were wacky)

Adorbs!!

As in bland, lacking in distinctiveness, drained of personality, with bizarrely unrealistic physical proportions designed by horny lonely men, and made to look unnecessarily young regardless of her age?

No thanks.

designed by horny lonely men
I see nothing sexualized about this at all. You may be experiencing some local interference.
Who hurt you, poppet?
It's pretty common to go for exaggerated or idealistic proportions, especially with this art style. And a lot of stylised characters end up looking young. The whole rounded Disney style does lack distinctiveness and personality now though, it's been overused.

Needs more songs about the prostitute with a short leg.

Way less creepy than the doll. Lol!

~~What movie is this on?~~

nevermind saw the description

The "bonus one" didn't show up for me in Sync so I had to open it in a browser. (@ljdawson@lemmy.world ...not sure if that's a known bug of some sort)

Very cool though!

Works for me
- Yes.
  It's been established that it must be something to do with the settings I use.

I don't understand why anybody would need an AI for something like that when artists literally do the same thing on Deviantart for kicks.

And people pay money to use those AIs. Like tons of money. Hiring some asshole to draw it out would literally be cheaper than the big AI platforms.

Why? Because my drawing skills suck. My computer skills, on the other hand, are excellent. And generating it is "free" (not counting stuff like 10 minutes of electricity supply). I'm not gonna pay someone to vaguely understand what I mean, waiting for who-knows-how-long until they finish it and then reiterating for who-knows-how-long again. Here I generated like 40 pictures until I was satisfied with how they looked. I spent like 10 minutes on it and am happy with the result. At the same time, a Disney-looking Nadja is not so important to me that I would actually pay someone to paint it. I literally did it only for this picture.
So no, this is an entirely different thing.
It would take about 20 minutes to produce this with zero skill for free with AI.