After a Witcher-free decade, CDPR still promises three sequels in six years
After a Witcher-free decade, CDPR still promises three sequels in six years
arstechnica.com
After a Witcher-free decade, CDPR still promises three sequels in six years
14 comments
-
-
Not a good sign.
-
Honestly never clicked with witcher 3. The characters and world are great but the gameplay was so incredibly dull.
-
For me that was with Witcher 2 and i just couldn't enjoy it, played the crap out of the first game and then tried and skipped the second one and then when Witcher 3 Enhanced Edition came out was really when i came back to the series and i know everyone loved the second one but there was just something off putting with the second game.
-
Finally someone who agrees with my sentiment. I have been saying for years (in my private offline circles) that the Witcher 2 is the runt of that litter!
-
-
Our last games were huge successes, sounds like we need to change the formula or we are toast.
-cd project red probably
-
Just in case, 3 games in a 6 year span means a game every 3 years, not every 2 years
Ex: TW4 in 2027, TW5 in 2030, TW6 in 2033
They took 4 years between games for the first trilogy, while creating their own engine for TW2 and TW3
-
Enshitification is back on the menu boys.
-
I hope I am wrong but this also sounds like an incoming AI slop.
-
Good luck on no stumbles to the first game. Then I guess reuse maps and assets as much as possible like Yakuza games though scope creed that requires major development is more common than not even with asset reuse
-
reuse maps and assets as much as possible
Once upon a time this was a method to expand on the story or add more to the game world, content people were craving. They came in packs, not those small pesky downloadable ones, but packages comparable in size to the original game. It's been so long, I can hardly remember what they were called...
Expansions?
-
14 comments
Going from too little to too much, and at the same time making another Cyberpunk.