Kindergarten forced to back down after proposing to charge parents $2,200 for their own children’s art
Kindergarten forced to back down after proposing to charge parents $2,200 for their own children’s art

Brisbane kindergarten forced to back down after proposing to charge parents $2,200 for their own children’s art

Before everyone piles on, it's probably worth understanding the context.
Yes, this was a daft idea, doomed to generate outrage, and outrage is an appropriate response.
However, as the article says, this non-profit was insolvent. This type of non-profit is not flying a CEO around in a private jet. Their entire budget for the year was $400k. Enough for rent, several staff, snacks and art supplies for kids.
The budget was very likely prepared by a volunteer, with limited skills and experience.
It's often also unclear what an organisation's total debts are. It's not at all uncommon to realise an error has been made in understanding an award or something and suddenly the centre owes 5 years back pay for underpaid over time or some such.
Suddenly the centre is insolvent and is required by law to cease it's activities.
At this point someone has had the misguided notion that the problem can be fixed by coercing parents to contribute towards the debts.
Explaining the problem to parents and asking for donations would've been fine, but obviously they wouldn't have received $40k in donations so it would've been unsuccessful.
Tying the request to the kids "art" is just poor taste all the way up and down.
So yeah, it's offensive, but it's not nefarious, and while it's really daft I can at least understand how it happened.
I did particularly like this:
Saying that in an indignant Australian accent makes it feel like it came straight out of some antipodean cringe-humor sitcom (FYI "Fisk" is pretty good!).
Maybe but it sounds like the current management committee inherited the problem. I'm dealing with that right now.
To add to that, it's in Australia and AU$2200 is about U$1500 / £1100 / €1250.
Average full time weekly wage is about $1,700 AUD before tax.
So it was a fundraiser? Hm, I actually don't have a problem with that and I think it's a nicer (more creative if you will) option than - idk, simply asking for money.
I work in this area and underfunding is a constant companion. Add to that the abysmally low pay and the disregard for all the extra work educators do, I get positively pissed off that they get in trouble for trying to fix a bad situation. Probably, as you said, brought up as unpaid labor by someone who had no nefarious thought at all about the whole thing, just wanted to help. Apparently they were unaware of rules and regulations, is the worst I can say here.
Did parents step up and donate money anyhow? That is the real question.
Yeah. I feel like a little bit of finesse could've averted this disaster.
$40k debts is pretty manageable. If that's owed to the ATO for example, as soon as you get a payment arrangement (easy to obtain) then you're no longer "insolvent". Pay it off over 2 years, so you get 3x of this type of fundraiser.
Given the staff "walk out", it's possible that the money is owed to employees, which muddies the waters.
Instead of saying "everyone has to pay $2,200", they should have said...
It's still a long shot, but it's a better chance than trying to guilt every parent into paying $2,200.