Rented e-bicycles more dangerous than e-scooters in cities
Rented e-bicycles more dangerous than e-scooters in cities

Rented e-bicycles more dangerous than e-scooters in cities

Rented e-bicycles more dangerous than e-scooters in cities
Rented e-bicycles more dangerous than e-scooters in cities
I got curious because the article doesn't elaborate at all about why that might be, so I read the study, and the study itself says it's not conclusive. Interesting, sure, but not useful until someone can say exactly why it might be.
Yes the headline is exaggerating the evidence presented in the article - (I'm shocked /s).
I think the authors are confident that the observed crash rate seems to be higher for eBikes . . . but that's not enough to say which is more dangerous.
I'd think rider attitudes will be one of the main things here - take a negligent or reckless eBiker and put them on an eScooter and I'm pretty sure they'll find a way to crash it. It's not obvious to me that they used trip average speed as a proxy for this - I think they should at least have tested if their ratios were the similar when comparing fast with fast and slow with slow - that'd have been easy enough and they probably have the sample size to do that.
They mention high-res GPS data so they could maybe have done a better "driving characteristics" thing - using acceleration and braking data as a proxy for riders who are either bad at reading the road - or are impatient. That might be where they'd need more data, as they'd probably need to establish a "normal" profile for each route - to benchmark the extremes of behaviour.
I guess that'd have taken a lot longer and the funding only goes so far. Interesting dataset they have for sure - maybe they'll do some more papers on it in future.
Which is a good reason to not have cars with those same people driving the same way
From the study:
Yes.
If this is in response to "but not useful until someone can say exactly why it might be.", I did not mean why the study says this, but why either vehicle might be safer over another, which the study admits it can't do conclusively.