Drew Barrymore has walked back her decision to resume her daytime talk show amid the writers' and actors' strikes: 'I am making the decision to pause the show's premiere until the strike is over.'
"I have listened to everyone, and I am making the decision to pause the show's premiere until the strike is over."
Drew Barrymore is officially hitting "pause" on production of her daytime talk show.
After days of enduring backlash surrounding her decision to resume The Drew Barrymore Show amid the writers' and actors' strikes, the host announced that she will no longer move forward with new episodes until the strikes end.
"I have listened to everyone, and I am making the decision to pause the show's premiere until the strike is over," Barrymore wrote on social media Sunday. "I have no words to express my deepest apologies to anyone I have hurt and, of course, to our incredible team who works on the show and has made it what it is today."
She added, "We really tried to find our way forward. And I truly hope for a resolution for the entire industry very soon."
Barrymore announced plans last week for her Daytime Emmy–winning show to resume production without its three Writers Guild of America writers who, along with the rest of their union, have been on strike since May, demanding higher wages, clearer contract provisions, and more.
The star quickly became the center of controversy, earning criticism from striking members of the WGA and the Screen Actors Guild – American Federation of Television and Radio Artists (SAG-AFTRA), in addition to others of the industry. Following her decision, the National Book Foundation also rescinded its invitation for Barrymore to host its annual awards event.
Her show resumed filming last week as picketers protested the choice outside the CBS Broadcast Center in New York. Some audience members said they were escorted out of tapings for wearing WGA-branded pins. A spokesperson for the show told EW in a statement that Barrymore was "completely unaware of the incident" and that their team is "in the process of reaching out to the affected audience members to offer them new tickets."
Barrymore initially defended her decision in a now-removed video she posted on Friday, explaining, "This is bigger than me and there other peoples' jobs on the line."
She continued, "I weighed the scales and I thought if we could go on during a global pandemic and everything that the world experienced through 2020, why would this sideline us? I just wanted to just put one foot in front of the other and make a show that's there for people regardless of anything else that's happening in the world."
Barrymore, a member of SAG-AFTRA, insisted that the show's return was "in compliance with not discussing or promoting film and television that is struck of any kind," according to strike rules. When season 4 was first announced, a CBS spokesperson confirmed to EW that the series would "not be performing any writing work covered by the WGA strike."
While Barrymore herself was not in violation as the series' host — daytime talk shows fall under a separate contract, the Network Television Code contract — resuming production meant that it left its writers behind. As the WGA-East announced on social media, "The [Drew Barrymore Show] is a WGA-covered, struck show that is planning to return without its writers… Any writing on The Drew Barrymore Show is in violation of WGA strike rules."
Cristina Kinon, a writer for the show, told The Daily Beast that she was disappointed to see Barrymore resume production on the series without its writing team. "It is frustrating," she said, "because it will prolong the strike, and we just want it to end."
When news broke that the series was coming back for a fourth season, CBS issued a statement to EW. "While our show has been largely an unscripted talk show from the beginning, the new shows we are producing this season will be completely unscripted until the strike ends," it read in part. "No one on our staff will fill a writing position. If you watch the show, it is obvious that Drew has always brought raw, unfiltered, spontaneous, open, and honest conversations to her viewers, and that will continue. The show also moves forward with important consideration to our staff and crew comprised of over 150 people, as well as our loyal viewers. We fully support Drew and her entire team 100 percent."
The show was set to return with new episodes on Monday, Sept. 18.
Glad she changed her mind. If she wants to support her crew, she can use her own star power to go on a talk show tour or whatever, to raise money, similar to what John Oliver is doing.
I think this is the right move, though I can't help but feel as though there is some double standard at work with all of the controversy this generated when compared to the relative lack of outrage that occurred back during the writers strike of 2008, where we had The Colbert Report, The Daily Show, Conan, etc. carrying on without their writers.
I don't know enough about the circumstances, but wasn't Conan doing his show, poorly, and without content, specifically to show that writers are needed.
He was deliberately doing bizarre unwritten bits and highlighting the fact that he had no writers. Now, I think that it might have been some of the best material he's ever done, some real weird experimental avant garde late night talk show comedy with him crawling around in his rafters and seeing how long he could keep his wedding ring spinning. But he never pretended that everything was normal or let us forget that he was on the side of the writers.
I've liked Conan since I was like 12 years old, but I really doubt that. He's definitely not been super vocal in any memorable way in terms of solidarity
Letterman owned his production company and negotiated an interim contract with WGA so his writers could continue to work.
Conan, Stewart, & Colbert had their hands forced by their networks threatening to fire their staff if they didn't return. Those three paid their staff out of pocket during the time worked during the strike. Conversely, Leno told his staff they were guaranteed the money, then NBC laid off 80 of them without pay and as far as I can tell, he didn't pay those folks and some of them weren't scheduled to return after the strike was over.
There was also a writers strike in 1988 where Letterman and Carson got permission from WGA to continue without writers.
All of this stuff made the news, but maybe it just wasn't of interest to you in those days.
Gotta respect some good character-growth, and learning from one’s mistakes. Between this and Ashton stepping down, we’ve really been demonstrating the power of the public shaming recently.
Good on her. It's rare to see someone take the criticism and learn from it rather than doubling down. She always seemed like a class act, if sometimes leaning a bit too hard into her ditz act.