Uncovering the Deceptive Logic That Exposes Jordan Peterson - YouTube
Uncovering the Deceptive Logic That Exposes Jordan Peterson - YouTube
New from Framing Logic, who quickly became one of my favourite channels.
Uncovering the Deceptive Logic That Exposes Jordan Peterson - YouTube
New from Framing Logic, who quickly became one of my favourite channels.
I agree with him, but he's wrong imo on a few of things so far, I'll keep editing.
Edit: I appreciate that he's showing how to break down the arguments, that's great for people who don't understand that process. Especially the poisoning the well, which is most of Jordon's arguments in general.
Just because you choose to be lazy and accept theory as it stands, doesn't mean everyone else has to. Faith is something different to that.
I disagree, we all have faith that there are things in science we don't understand and that also that certain things exist until proven wrong. You have to to do the process of science. I love this guy, but I think he hasn't thought this through completely.
Edit: I really like his spread sheet to formulate the logic being shown. It's amazing. He makes quite a few jumps though, imo.
You're getting a lot of pushback here, and I'm not sure if you truly don't understand why or if you are trolling/being disingenuous on purpose. Webster's definition of faith:
1
a : allegiance to duty or a person : loyalty
"lost faith in the company's president"
b(1) : fidelity to one's promises
b(2) : sincerity of intentions
"acted in good faith"
2
a(1) : belief and trust in and loyalty to God
a(2) : belief in the traditional doctrines of a religion
b(1) : firm belief in something for which there is no proof
"clinging to the faith that her missing son would one day return"
b(2) : complete trust
3
something that is believed especially with strong conviction especially : a system of religious beliefs
"the Protestant faith"
None of these definitions of faith fit science. Scientific theory is not faith in the slightest. Scientific theories cannot exist without evidence and observation. Faith has no such requirement.
Religious faith is equatable to blind unwavering belief and trust.
That is absolutely NOT equivalent to a scientific theory that resulted from the scientific method of analysis and discovery
If anyone wants more like this, Cody Johnston did a really short and concise breakdown of why Peterson is both made and full of shit on his YouTube Showdy(aka Some More News)
It really is as short as it could have been.
Don't look at the timestamps!
There's another more recent one that just breaks down his performance on surrounded to show how he's playing calvinball with debate