Inuit leader says he's been reassured Bill C-5 won't violate modern treaties

Cool, so if it'll be fine with them anyways, why not give them a veto.

When asked whether land claim organizations have a veto, Obed said provisions in their agreements "could be defined as vetoes, but really we see them as enabling."

Is that a weasel I smell?

could be defined as vetoes

Is it an actual veto, or is it not?