'It's a paperweight now': Why the Mounties' ban of popular rifle led to so much pushback
'It's a paperweight now': Why the Mounties' ban of popular rifle led to so much pushback
When it comes to Canada's often tense debate around gun laws, most Canadians likely will not have heard of an RCMP database called the Firearms Reference Table, or FRT.
The FRT is a database used by the RCMP to help classify firearms. That classification determines whether a gun is non-restricted, restricted or prohibited.
Technically, the FRT isn't a legal instrument, but instead just an internal RCMP tool based on definitions set out in the Criminal Code and Firearms Act. But in practice?
"It's both the law and not the law," said A.J. Somerset, the author of Arms: The Culture and Credo of the Gun.
My issue with this is the RCMP have moved into de facto position of making rules/laws about what is legal and illegal ... AND THAT'S NOT THEIR FUCKING JOB.
When LEOs are given those kinds of responsibilities, without oversight, it is in direct violation of our Charter and Constitution.
I'm not saying we shouldn't have limits on some weapons. I'm saying the cops shouldn't be setting those limits.
Can you cite exactly which part of the charter and constitution it violates? Or is this more gun nut, trying not to sound like a gun nut, bullshit?
Last time I checked, the charter provides you with no guarantees to buy AR-15 mock military rifles that you don't need for hunting.
Yeah, cause pistol-calibre carbine shooting it not for hunting deer, it's for killing as many human beings as possible as quickly as possible. It's a fucking joke that gun nuts think anyone should give one rats ass about this. Because, let's be clear, the problem here is not with banning this gun, and not with the RCMP being the agency banning this gun, the only problem is that manufacturers are allowed to start manufacturing and selling new guns without oversight or regulation:
Criminal Defence lawyer & Firearms lawyer - Ian Runkle (YouTuber: Runkle Of The Bailey) has made a request to the Supreme Court challenging for procedural fairness in regard to the firearm confiscation fiasco, given that Justin Trudeau bypassed the House of Commons and Parliament with his OIC, it’s fair to say Canadians are expected a proper judicial due-process especially when it comes to confiscating people’s private property.
It’s not a “buyback”, the Canadian Government never owned these firearms to begin with, it’s a forced confiscation with a monetary compensation. You know it’s bad when the Ontario Government won’t divert RCMP resources to assist in this confiscation and that Canada Post won’t assist either.
You forget about sports shooters and that the International Practial Shooting Confederation exists, which rely on these firearms being accessible to practice and participate.
Just recently Wes Steven’s had to borrow a firearm from an American competitor just to participate in the competition.
Might want to see what Runkle of the Bailey has to say about this. He's a Canadian Firearms lawyer with a YouTube channel
Edit: NM he's cited two comments down the other comment chain in this thread.