YouTuber faces jail time for showing off Android-based gaming handhelds - Ars Technica
YouTuber faces jail time for showing off Android-based gaming handhelds - Ars Technica

YouTuber faces jail time for showing off Android-based gaming handhelds

YouTuber faces jail time for showing off Android-based gaming handhelds - Ars Technica
YouTuber faces jail time for showing off Android-based gaming handhelds
In what part are they legal?
I think a lot of abandonware is legal? Devices like this usually support few dozens old consoles, which you can't even buy, and you can't buy games for them. Stuff like commodore64, old nintendo, etc. And you upload stuff there via USB usually. So the problem I guess is to see where the line draws, because some of those ancient games are legal to pirate now while others are still illegal because their right holder is still in business even though they effectively are abandoned and impossible to buy.
The legality of abandonware is disputed. Traditionally, even if the IP is unavailable, it doesn't make it legal to distribute. Copyright law is also defined jurisdictionaly. I'm not defending copyright, but it is important to understand risks when accessing this.
Now, in the States, I didn't believe receiving or even playing this game system would be illegal, but people have been jailed for making and distributing such devices. Our corporate overlords also have no qualms about squelching content based on perceived copyright violations.
This influencer is in Italy, and the laws seem to be heavily against owning such system.
We're talking about devices like the R36S, which come with an SD-Card with the full NES, SNES and MegaDrive library and several hundreds of MAME games, N64, PS1, PSP and so on. Those things are really incredible - they cost almost nothing (like 35€) and give you a really crazy value for your money. Buy them before authorities catch up, but yeah, there is nothing legal about them and many games that come with them are not abandoned.
Those are good reasons when considering ethics of piracy in general but not legality. For me ethics angle is thrown out of the window the moment profit is involved however and I’m pretty sure that guy was doing videos for ad money.
Possibly some of them are legal/open source and others are not?
Those are entirely legal while the article implies there is some legal gray area involved.
I know it’s cool to dunk on Nintendo and sometimes it’s an actual moral obligation but I prefer not to lose sight of facts. There’s lots of bad PR against Nintendo lately, mostly based on unverified claims of anonymous people. It gets tiring that
journalistsmediaworkers care only about clicks.