Well, since the last game fizzled out, does anyone have any suggestions for games they'd like to play? I'm open to GM anything ;)
Well, since the last game fizzled out, does anyone have any suggestions for games they'd like to play? I'm open to GM anything ;)
I am game to run whatever you guys want to play.
I have experience playing 20xx, Troika, FU, Whitebox and a variety of other systems.
I am also willing to try any rules light system (as it is best for play by post, especially here on Lemmy).
Any genre as well, I'll go with the group consensus. Give me suggestions and we'll see where we end up. Let's get our game ooooonnnnn! ;D
I wonder how much more popular this community would be if it wasn't hosted on .ml. It's unfortunate, but many people are refusing to participate in .ml communities these days.
Sad to hear the last attempt fizzled out, I really love this community and this initiative.
Honestly, I'm unapologetically an .ml user, if someone doesn't want to participate because it's an .ml community I'd rather not engage with them anways. What's unfortunate is that us .ml users are on the recieving end of so much hate and derision. I'm frankly tired of it.
I'm not a fundamentalist on the issue, I subscribe to !crows@lemmy.ml and !dota2@lemmy.ml and comment there on occasion, and have never had any problems. Most .ml users I've interacted with have been perfectly pleasant and normal.
That being said, creating an account somewhere else is absolutely trivial, as is moving over all your subscriptions, settings and saved posts. Several apps have this functionality built in, even. Having your account on any given instance broadly means you're aligning yourself with and approve of its admins and moderation policy - in fact, that's the whole point of the Fediverse system of instances. Given all of that, I wouldn't call it "unfortunate" that normal .ml users are getting collateral damage from the actions of the admins and mods. You're more or less explicitly approving of the political stance of .ml. Even if that political stance is one you agree with, it's easy to see how many people don't. Combine that with a very aggressive moderation policy and it's not hard to see why many people are turned off.