There's always money for the military. But climate?
There's always money for the military. But climate?
www.nationalobserver.com
There's always money for the military. But climate?
14 comments
-
-
Just like provinces and municipalities.
"No money for education, healthcare, or bike lanes."
Also, "We're spending countless tens of millions to widen a road so that people can sit in traffic for 30 seconds less than before while making it less safe for all other road users! Vote for us again, plz."
-
You missed an important word for the part about traffic
… can sit in traffic for 30 seconds less than before (temporarily) …
-
Until induced demand kicks in, then you'll be with the other idle motorists for an extra 4 minutes! LOL
-
-
We're also giving billions in corporate subsidies. We finance their development and they get to keep the rewards.
-
Frustratingly, this is how corporations do business just about anywhere in the world. Why bother subsidizing at all? Either make it publicly owned or tell them that they are on their own. Viable businesses will succeed without handouts.
-
-
-
Nope, we're all going to hell, on Earth.
https://youtube.com/watch?v=12Ch-NIYxvQ
Oops, turns out the SMOC, the Antarctic counterpart to the AMOC... yeah looks like it broke and flipped about a decade ago.
So, that means the global thermohaline circulation system is in fact currently collapsing, heat transfer flows in the worlds oceans are going to do increasingly unpredictable wild shit, which will cause increasingly unpredictable large scale weather patterns...
Oh! And because this fucks up the salinity and nutrient concentrations of uh, ocean water basically everywhere...
I guess the Dolphins will soon be boarding their ships along to 'So long and thanks for all the fish!'.
-
Merge them. Create the climate corps and allocate federal funding to that branch of military operation, that's how you actually get funding, and it makes sense because climate shift is a security threat as much as anything else. Also, given how shit is turning south of the border, this is the most comfortable I've ever been with more military spending. I'm just saying this doesn't have to be an either-or dichotomy.
-
They want you to use public transport but increase prices while the service degrade
-
They increase the price and decrease the frequency or have trouble maintaining their infrastructure because of government financial cuts to said public transport services.
Get your head outta your butt.
-
Both
-
-
-
Always? We've been underfunding our military for generations. This new spending is badly needed catch up to get us functional.
-
We’re all gonna burn and be overwhelmed by millions upon millions of climate refugees.
14 comments
It's not like it's an existential threat or anything. Besides, we can just use the military to shoot at the climate until it cooperates. /s
Fire "fighters" are now using semi-automatic rifles to put out forest fires by shooting at the flames.