"Impulse," maybe, but "instinct," no. It's important to always remember that car-dependency was not a natural or inevitable consequence of "progress" or modern technology, but rather the result of very deliberate government policy. Development that happens "naturally" (in the absence of zoning laws and FHA loan guidelines) does not look like this.
Even driving a car, I hate these types of development. They're ugly as hell, annoying to navigate, and they only get more clumsy as the surrounding areas become population dense.
i always like to say that america is specifically designed to be miserable for everyone, the nordics are what it looks like when you actually design for cars, and the netherlands is convenient for everyone.
No one thought this. The problem is not that one person thought this was best but that the system is set up such that each individual is incentivized to make choices that collectively result in what you see here.
You haven’t driven one have you? I have, I owned one for three years, well technically it was the EUDM accord but it is the same car save for a few things.
It has a beautifully balanced chassis.
The buildquality is way above what’s expected in this class.
The k series engine is a gem, loves to rev and sounds great doing it.
The manual transmission is probably the nicest shifting you’ll ever find in a fwd.
And now to the subjective things:
It is good looking.
Great seats.
The interior is well thought out.
The rainsensing wipers turned on and off exactly as I would want them to, that is the only car I can say that about and I’ve driven a lot of newer car including premiumcars.
i often see people posting pbotos of some landscape or other and people commenting how beautiful it is.. and I'm like "there's a fucking road through the middle!"
i assume they just don't see it, like the person in a gorilla suit on the sidewalk that people don't see.. speaking of which