Even though we all knew it was coming, it’s sad to see such a prominent figure explicitly reject reality in order to custom-design his own echo chamber.
This idiot clown can’t even decide what number to give it, well, garbage in, garbage out. Go ahead and rewrite all of humanity you doofus. I hope he chokes to death on a grape.
Elon is kind of stupid, definitely not as smart as he has presented himself. Reading his tweets, however, I have very serious concerns about the critical thinking levels of his fans.
Only time I used gr*k, I asked it how good of a gamer elon is. It wont respond if you use his name so I asked again with "elongated muskrat" and it replied. Then I asked it to just give me a score out of ten, and it said 3/10.
This bastard thinks he can rewrite history. Grok is now just a crock of ol bullshit.
Ain't grocking shit here.
He doesn't deserve to use that word to name his
If you are a US citizen, call your representative and plead with them to quit X. X is actively attacking historical records and accounts
Me: Wow this is terrible, I should download a local copy of wikipedia, its only like 30gig right?
Wikipedia: Heres a nepenthies like trap of pages that don't actually have a download link and all just link back to eachother, also the actual archive is in a format no ones ever heard of and needs a dedicated reader AND a dedicated very suspicious looking torrenting software to download in the first place.
I still haven't figured that shit out, Every now and then theres this push to get people to back it up locally but then it seems like they deliberately make it as hard as they possibly can to do so.
It has been a lot since I needed to download Wikipedia, it is very easy, AFAIK there is Wikimedia with backups of all wiki sites.
The weird file sizes are just a compressed file format, sql and XML. Maybe it is a bit more complex run Wikipedia locally, but the content information is easy to retrieve.
The only issue is that sql and xml are plain text files, and plain text compresses very well, so a 30GB backup can become easily 100GB uncompressed.
Actually, not the wrong place. The similarities are enough that I think Ted was probably in the middle of a Ketamine bender when they told him about the Timor swarm
I think there‘s a grain of truth here. I think they are deleting “errors” and adding “missing” information, to make Grok give the “right” kinds of answers—their kinds. The Day Grok Told Everyone About ‘White Genocide’
There so much Elon hate. Hate for LLM and AI. Especially towards corrupting our information. Spreading lies.
But rather than spread more hate, what are you doing to preserve and boost our knowledge and information?
Anyone can hate. How are you supporting the side your vehemently defending? Are you lending storage space to Anna's archive? Are you donating to internet archive? What are you bringing to the table to counteract the negativity and the dark side.
The whole class of “yeah well what are you doing about it” rebuttals are non sequiturs. They’re BS arguments thrown when you don’t actually have an argument, but feel the need to express one anyway.
This is an ignorant take. Anyone with PC hardware could be using any amount if storage to self host archives before human knowledge is locked down and stripped of what truths are left.
There's plenty of resources online for anyone possessing all levels of knowledge from none to expert for how to get involved and actually help. If you can't help or don't want to apply the effort then you can donate to say Internet Archive, Wikipedia, your foundation of choice.
I guess by spreading hate it might spread general consensus like one replier mentioned but other than that your non sequitor argument seems to fall through. The point was for people to get active. To get involved in the process. Not just words and hatred.
donating to wikipedia. Considering to donate to anna's too, probably will quite soon. Can I keep on hating then?
Also pointing out a hype for what is, when many people are on the fence, is helpful to forming public consensus. And people are generally reasonable enough to direct most of their hate towards the billionaires and tech giants who are trying to oversell LLMs for profit and not towards the field of AI itself.
The authors are transparent about the framework's current limitations. The primary challenge is catastrophic forgetting; as the model sequentially integrates new edits, its performance on earlier tasks degrades (Figure 6). While SEAL can perform multiple updates without a complete collapse, robustly preserving knowledge remains an open problem for this line of research.
Not sure if all the advanced reasoning in the world can actually find missing information, can it? So, at best, it can only make an educated leap of logic across the gap of information. But shouldn't people be first alerted that such gaps have been found, and then make a call of action to find it? Otherwise, it just seems making up missing info is only going to generate the same kind of questionable material we are trying to get rid of. Wouldn't it be smarter to just use more caution? Forget auto-deletion (too much like "auto-drive"), just highlight (or lowlight) the questionable material, AND then maybe copy it over to its own "Encyclopedia of Errors A-Z". Just my idea.
But, what do you think?
Looking forward to all his boasting about self driving Teslas being the best profit generator in the history of mankind falling flat on its face. Seems like this isn't far behind