Musk claimed that ADL could be "on the hook" for $22B in X losses.
As X bleeds cash, Musk threatens Anti-Defamation League with defamation lawsuit — Musk claimed that ADL could be “on the hook” for $22B in X losses::Musk claimed that ADL could be "on the hook" for $22B in X losses.
Musk said that once the controversy is stirred, X advertisers pause their spending until the ADL gives the green flag, which allegedly the ADL "will not do without" X "agreeing to secretly suspend or shadow-ban any account they don’t like."
"That is the relationship they’ve had with X/Twitter for many years," Musk said. "Presumably, they have that with all western search or social media orgs."
What a fucking idiot...
Like, he really seems close to getting that advertisers don't like advertising with bigots, but he thinks it has to be some grand conspiracy because he just can't fathom others having empathy. Like that's just not an option to him.
There has to be a nefarious middle man to make it happen
This is purely for attention. They are a non-profit, and certainly have nowhere near even 1/10th of that money. Say he did win a civil case, that'd shut down the ADL into bankruptcy, then they re-launch fresh.
He knows that, but he's also a sociopath and any and all attention is all he really wants.
ADL would almost certainly file an anti-SLAPP claim and probably win. California’s anti-SLAPP law even says that it’s contents should be broadly considered as a bulwark against assholes using the courts to prevent public participation. If ADL does win an anti-SLAPP motion, Musk would end up paying their lawyers fees down to the cent.
And because he's an insecure aged boy, he doesn't have the intellect and emotional maturity to grapple with the fact his decisions are why he's failing
I still have trouble believing that Elon can possibly be this dumb. There's something willful about everything he's doing and that includes intentionally ruining Twitter. Yes, a lot of this is for attention and theatrics, but he didn't need to buy then tank a social media platform for that.
The ADL have encouraged a boycott of advertising on Ex-Twitter because it didn’t do enough to censor nazis. Advertisers have pulled their funds. Ex-Twitter was never a great place to run ads (I’ve tried) and recently it’s become a shit show.
I don’t see how, in any of this, there is any credible case for slander/libel he can make against the ADL. And there is no way in hell that any judge would actually award $22bil in hypothetical ad revenue.
Rich guys like Musk spend so much time getting their ego stoked that I think he might genuinely be unable to process the idea that he made a mistake. The wealthy can never fail, only be failed.
Ironic how a service that can be run by volunteers on a decently low cost got taken over by one of the richest men on the planet, who then can't keep it alive because of financial problems. 😅😂
More like sad how such a sad fucker can coast for so long on inherited wealth and reputation by buying up useful stuff and taking credit for what was developed by actual smart people
I am apparently one of the dissenting voices here, having read many comments, but I do think he has a point. The ADL has an agenda and they do represent Israeli interests.
That being said... are they the cause for $22B in Twitter losses? Not likely at all.
Are they the cause for losses of individuals of that volume? Possibly
Are they the cause for losses for OPEC and islamic countries in excess of $22B? At least that much.
I have no idea whats going to happen here but discovery on this case is going to be crazy revealing. Someone shot themselves in the foot here and its either going to be Musk or the ADL.