Calling Nettanyahu a fascist and warcriminal apparently is zionism? Also I have never done anything in that community
Calling Nettanyahu a fascist and warcriminal apparently is zionism? Also I have never done anything in that community
I have never posted, commented or did anything else in this community and only found out when I wanted to make a post about the GNU Taler in Switzerland.
I have been a vocal critic of Israeli Warcrimes and Nettanyahus authoritarianism, calling him a potential Fascist. But I guess that wasn't Anti-Israel enough and therefore Zionism.
I guess this is a modern-day example of "the revolution devours its own children".
See I know that a nigger loves turkey and chicken, but give that coon some possum. Gravy running down that possum's back will make a nigger lick his lips full in delight.
PTB, @MysticMushroom1776@lemmy.dbzer0.com is probably a nigger, she acts just like a female nigger. Controlling and powerhungry. Apparently antisemitic too, funny how these wokies are.
Checking your comment history, you seemed to conflate anti Zionism with anti Semitism, and accused @FelixCress@lemmy.world of being an antisemite. I'm going with YDI.
This is what I could tell from the comments though. If I'm wrong do correct me.
Go back home you terrorist sand nigger!
This one is a nigger for sure, a sand nigger
I tend to be careful to not call a person antisemitic, which leads to more confrontation and toxicity from my experience, but to instead explain to them why their actions are antisemitic. The same here.
I went back to look at the Discussion and in this case this particular user told me that "Jews" were the "Nationality" of Israel. I told them why this was antisemitism, told them why (mixing Judaism the Religion with Israel the state) and asked them to stop this.
I honestly don't think I did anything wrong there. I didn't call them antisemitic and instead calmly explained to them why their statements were antisemitic. I blocked them instead of letting the discussion get out of control when it became clear they would continue even after my explanation why it was antisemitic.
No name-calling, calm explanation and disengagement instead of escalation.
You are not wrong. He appears to be one of genocide apologists.
Edit: Funnily enough, I don't even consider myself "anti Zionist", although Israeli supporters may think about me this way since I support one state with equal rights for all residents and right to return for all Palestinian refugees and their descendants.
But more importantly, I am just opposed to genocide and nazi scum. I guess this is enough to be labelled these days.
I support one state with equal rights for all residents and right to return for all Palestinian refugees and their descendants. But more importantly, I am just opposed to genocide and nazi scum.
This is anti-zionism. You should consider yourself an anti-zionist. It's actually a good thing to oppose fascism. No need to quibble about it.
I'd bet money on it being due to your support of this user who was banned for alleged zionism
I believe this was partially responsible but not the whole story
Wait, so I was banned for disagreeing with a moderator?
That's almost worse and even more powertripping, wtf?
I don't think its necessarily because you disagreed with them. They likely have rules or policies of some kind against it and banned said user for a reason. You trying to defend a user that they had banned, does it not sound like you are either apart of that or atleast preventing the fires form being put out after they had banned the user. You are conflicting with a moderation decision against a user that they likely deemed violated some of their rules.
Idk, it makes sense to me that if they feel that other user is a Zionist and banned them for Zionism, then they would also want to ban you for agreeing with that user because, in their eyes, that'd be pretty clear cut Zionist apologia
