The “One Big Beautiful Bill Act” has passed the House of Representatives, despite having a name that feels like I dreamt it up for a comedy skit. Assuming the bill passes through Senate unmodified, that means big changes for EV and PHEV buyers in the USA. Among other things, this congressional budge...
TL;DR: EV cars & SUVs will face an average 16% effective price increase, with the lowest cost model up more than 28%, if the law passes the Senate and goes into effect as written.
It's hard to imagine any way this doesn't throw a huge wrench into the adoption of sustainable car technology for the USA.
Only about 8% of new cars sold last year in the USA were electric, compared to 13% for the EU or 25% for China. Seems like exactly the wrong moment to cut tax incentives for the tech.
It is honestly hard to see what the strategy is. It's tough when you squint at the administration and wonder how an adversary-backed Manchurian Candidate type might do things differently, and you come up mostly dry.
I'm not big on the "we have to beat China" rhetoric, but it's like republican politicians wake up every morning and ask themselves "What can I do today to further Chinese dominance in the next century?"
For shame, OP, removing a key word in the title. When you posted this, and as I type this reply, this legislation has passed the house but not the senate. Whether or not it will is yet to be seen, but the tax credit is not yet set to expire.
For the record, I didn’t download the article. I don’t particularly care if the body of the article “clears it up “. You removed a key word and that changes the title. And you know it.
the tax credit didn't incentivize ANY EV, there were North America assembly standards that had to be met to qualify. so do you want manufacturing back in the US or not? make up your fuckin minds.
in the bigger picture, this ridiculous 4-year yoyo of legislating everything with simple majority budget bills is not sustainable. we can't build anything like this.
I agree they have no legitimate plan and are just fumbling with a bunch of idiotic moves and call it governing, but I also agree with the other commentor that these credits aren't as great as people think because manufactures have time and time again raised prices by amounts equivalent to these credit amounts (like when Biden revamped the expiring credit system) so all we're really doing is subsidizing these major corporations with our tax dollars.
7% of our exports are currently vehicles (about $145b annually), that will dwindle to nearly nothing as ICE vehicles become a legacy side-show to EVs and PHEVs :,|
That's to say nothing of serving our own market, and the pride of having Americans at work building brilliant and cutting edge things.
The tax credits are just a money grab for the manufacturers and dealers. If you do the math, a 68k loan with a 6-7% interest rate and the $7500 tax credit has the same total cost as no tax credit and a 0.99% rate. That's why they always offer "manufacturer incentives" with $0 due at signing or those 0-2% loans, but almost never both.
It really depends on if you have good credit or not to make the tax credit a good deal.
This edition of the quarterly publication examines how new U.S. tariffs are threatening consumer adoption and sales of battery electric vehicles (BEVs). It also explains why these automobiles are at a disadvantage compared to their internal combustion engine (ICE) counterparts when it comes to import taxes.
“Rapid shifts in trade policy are reshaping the automotive landscape, with tariffs affecting not only the cost of components but also the dynamics of assembly, supply chain transparency and even pricing strategies,” said Ryan Mandell, Mitchell’s director of claims performance. “While these challenges impact all automakers doing business in the U.S., they are more pronounced for manufacturers of BEVs. Insurers will need to collaborate closely with suppliers and collision repair partners to navigate tariff complexities and prepare for future uncertainty.”