Detecting throwaway email addresses during registration
Spammers, trolls, and ban evaders often use temporary email addresses. PieFed now checks a list of known temporary email providers and displays a warning icon next to registrations that use such services.
If registration mode is set to "Open" (no approval needed) then the site admin(s) receive a notification instead.
A throwaway email address isn't always a bad thing but it's one factor that admins might want to take into account.
I have to chime in and say this feels a bit underthought feature. I use a throwaway email for everything possible, and I would imagine a large portion of Fediverse users do that too.
I also get the motivation behind the feature. I didn't feel like throwaway addresses are worth it before I started using them. They may seem like an obvious spammer flag. But I'd say it's 50/50, just like with any free email provider like gmail or Proton mail.
You say it's 50/50 based on your own experience/anecdotal evidence. Admins will probably be able to make that determination with a much greater deal of accuracy based on what they see happening on their instance. So it makes sense to leave the choice to them/enable them to make that choice, right?
True, I failed to mention that I think there could be a setting to enable the feature, or dismiss the warning per-account. @rimu@piefed.social maybe consider this?
I don't really understand the hostility to this. Do users understand why emails are part of account registration in the first place instead of letting you sign up without an email?
To be fair Lemmy does allow you to sign up without any email at all (or at least used to, dunno if they changed it), so it's not surprising that this goes against many peoples expectations.
I have to say that's extremely unfortunate that you would add such a feature. We use aliases to maintain our privacy and this is come corpo surveillance shit. Not cool.
Aliases are different and not flagged by this feature. It just looks at domain names.
Multiple big Lemmy instances have been using the exact same blocklist for a long time (although it's not a core feature, they've patched it in somehow). I got the idea by lurking in the Lemmy matrix rooms and seeing their discussion.
Ok, but that's not the only use case for it. It's also used by spammers and abusers to make everyone else's lives worse and it's admins who have to bear the brunt of that.
So I think it's fair to give them the option to weigh the costs and benefits of allowing it and then either do or not do something about it.
This is just lazy discrimination and a deep disrespect for the privacy of your users. If you can't be bothered to actually admin a community properly then don't create a community.
Does this include people that use email aliases to keep the connections between accounts harder to make? I pay for this service so it's genuinely not a throw away account. Just a way to maintain some privacy.
You're free to maintain your privacy and admins are free to weigh the potential risk of accepting an application with a warning icon on it. I'm sure there will be plenty who ignore it.
I appreciate the straightforward answer of you're not sure answer (no sarcasm) . I just want to make sure paranoid people like me can still participate and I keep their level of privacy