You don’t win by hating everyone that doesn’t agree with you on 100% of everything. Problem with the left actually are these fucking purity tests. It’s why the left is weak as fuck. We could build a coalition, but no that guy one time did or said something I don’t like, so therefore I’d rather let evil win instead. Exactly what happened when it comes to Biden and Gaza.
The left fails to understand that power is incremental. On day one, you don’t get 100% of what you want. If you’re lucky you get 1% of it and you shift the Overton window. You just gotta keep pulling people your way and shifting the Overton window. You get a little more of what you want overtime, but the most important thing is that you’re moving in a direction that is where you want to go. But, everyone down voting me wants everything their way right fucking now, or they don’t want any of it. Well, I can tell you, you’re getting nothing that you want right now. Learn to work together.
I'd normally agree, but fuck Comey. His choice to reopen the investigation into Clinton and loudly announce it two days before the election is why we're in the situation we're in. He blatantly used his position to help Trump win. Just because he has buyer's remorse doesn't mean he's not a traitorous piece of shit.
lol…are you seriously getting mad at dems for being too democratic?
You talk like people would just suddenly stop saving the world just because a person, who forgot to recycle that one time, agreed.
You don’t require to be all in the same car to drive to the same destination. Not all things must be a partisan.
Partisanship and coalitions are too black and white. It’s all based on agreeing 100% of the time. Just look at the right: Kissing the ring is a purity test. That is the opposite of democracy. It’s bound to failure for every reason you just pointed out: it overlooks way too much just to serve the most powerful few to keep it all in one party.
In fact if anything: this whole ‘everything needs to be a coalition and partisan’ is where a lot of the main issues started. People are way more complicated than that. You will never ever have everyone agree to all things all the time. In democracy disagreement is a feature. Not a bug.
Dems are not wrong for breaking off and fracture. that is what democracy is. They can agree on some things and keep checks on other things. The meaning behind checks and balances. That’s by design.
I have an account on another social media platform whose name is an anagram of “[unalive] to trump.” Well, not the word unalive but a fourfive letter word of the same meaning. Nobody has figured it out yet.
Not that I’d ever physically harm anyone. I’m not violent. But I will celebrate with gusto on the day he becomes unalive no matter the cause (massive aneurism is my bet).
“Death” was the word I was trying to impart, but I didn’t want to trigger any mods with the whole phrase. I just realized I can’t count to five either. Oops. Man I need to take a break.
47 should be 86'd, primarily because the genocide that Israel is committing in Palestine (which resembles the genocide the nazis committed against the Jews in WWII) has intensified a lot under Trump. Of course the underlying problem is Zionism, which is inherently a colonial project, and Zionism as an ideology has about as much right to exist as Nazism. From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free, and a good first step would be to 8647.