"Baby on Board" is a terrible sticker for your car
At first, it seems innocuous: baby on board! Please be a little more careful driving near this vehicle.
But what does this imply? Shouldn't we be driving carefully enough to preserve life and health, regardless of who is in the next car over? Does the absence of a "baby on board" sticker imply "don't worry about us as much! Feel free to be more aggressive" ? I'd hope not. Besides, babies aren't the only people who are more fragile than an assumed strong, healthy adult. Cars everywhere have plenty of elderly people and people with various conditions who would be in more serious danger in a car crash. I'd go so far as to say everyone on the road is somewhere on a spectrum between "peak human physical and mental condition" and "extraordinarily fragile", and we cannot know or judge where each person is at. We should be driving carefully out of an abundance of caution no matter what.
Maybe the idea is based on assumptions about the longer potential remaining lifespan of a baby, compared to an adult? A kind of utilitarian argument about reducing harm by preserving more years of life? If that sounds a bit familiar, it is part of the concept of Quality-Adjusted Life Years (QALYs), which is an integral concept in Effective Altruism, among other uses. I won't go into the details of Effective Altruism, but let's just say it's a pretty terrible system for deciding where to spend resources that glorifies the ability of rich people to do philanthropy and provides support for some racist and eugenicist outcomes. In any event, it certainly doesn't make sense for every driver on the road to be making some kind of QALY analysis of their neighbors on the road at every point of the journey.
I believe that all life is precious. I make an effort to drive that way, too.
P.S. the best interventions to make driving safer for everyone are systemic and infrastructural: crash-compatible vehicles, available alternatives to driving, slower speeds, modal filters, etc. I don't blame baby on board sticker havers for the absence of these things.
Does the absence of a “baby on board” sticker imply “don’t worry about us as much! Feel free to be more aggressive” ?
Well yeah. If you're at fault in an accident and you killed a baby, the jury is not gonna be happy with you. If you killed a non-baby maybe they'll let it slide depending on circumstances.
Nah, they are there as a warning. A warning that the person driving the car is sleep deprived and distracted and you need to watch out for poor driving because of it.
Unlike what is implied in the gruesome folklore that has come to be associated with these advisories, their purpose was not to alert rescue workers to the presence of babies at accident scenes; they were instead supplications to other drivers to exercise additional care, reminders that they shared the road with vehicles carrying children.
Apparently not. Link is a source from Wikipedia, where Wiki says "... However, this is not the intended purpose as stated by the company Safety 1st, which marketed the product at the time of its peak popularity."
The sticker is there to alert you that they're likely not going to be speeding or responding to you riding up their arse, so you might as well overtake them. Nothing to do with safety IMO.
"Gerry Boyle: I don't want to see it. Babies all look the same. The only time a baby doesn't look like every other baby is when it's a really ugly baby. So unless you're about to show me a photo of a really ugly baby then I don't want to see it."