Look — just look — at the rules Minnesota law now requires police to follow when assigned to schools, the rules over which they are now utterly losing continence. Seriously. Take a look.
Look — just look — at the rules Minnesota law now requires police to follow when assigned to schools, the rules over which they are now utterly losing continence. Seriously. Take a look.
Attached: 1 image Look — just look — at the rules Minnesota law now requires police to follow when assigned to schools, the rules over which they are now utterly losing continence. Seriously. Take a look. If following •these• rules prevents you from doing your job, then your job really shoul...
Under the law change, police officers assigned to schools — called school resource officers (SROs) — cannot use prone restraints, meaning placing a student in a face-down position.
In addition, the law says they cannot “inflict any form of physical holding that restricts or impairs a pupil’s ability to breathe; restricts or impairs a pupil’s ability to communicate distress; places pressure or weight on a pupil’s head, throat, neck, chest, lungs, sternum, diaphragm, back, or abdomen; or results in straddling a pupil’s torso.”
Officers working in schools may use these kinds of restraints, however, “to prevent imminent bodily harm or death to the student or to another.”
Sounds like nothing but common sense safety restrictions to me, with a (probably too-broad) exception at the end.
And Minnesota cops and police departments are freaking out that they won't be able to damage or kill kids quite so freely as they'd like.
Being handcuffed while prone can impair breathing, it does kill people. EMS is expressly trained to never allow an arrested patient to lay like that, you’d hope cops learn the same.
lol. cops learning? you're kidding right? the only thing they learn is that they can get away with murder.
Honestly I was not sure while I was reading the rule but the last line actually makes it clear. It really is basically saying don't use this stuff casually but only when there is a severe valid reason.
They'll just state that there was an imminent threat and that'll be it. Cops already do it all the time when they shoot people who are complying and not threatening anything. The police unions are strong enough that it doesn't matter that they're lying - if they get fired, they just go and get hired at another PD 5 miles up the road.
It's the ole South Park, "They're coming right for us!"
Look up the word "continence".
They're losing their shit, so sounds right to me.