What does ZFC do that Peano arithmetic can't do?
More precisely, is there a "natural" statement (a statement that isn't deliberately constructed to be an example) that can be stated in PA, proved in ZFC, but not provable in PA?
mo. abbr. please
Plz!
To be fair these abbreviations are ubiquitously used.
Peano Axioms
ZFC
Well, Con(PA) is a "natural" statement I'd say, and ZFC proves Con(PA).
What does a Nikon camera have to do with IPv6 private address space?