I think it is funny. I enjoyed it because like most good humor, it is a playful exaggeration on patterns that exist on real life. Sometimes those patterns break along racial or gendered lines, and that's ok. You're not a bad person if you think it's funny. I get laughs out of lighthearted humor that pokes fun at men as well.
Are they really patterns, though? Or is it confirmation bias?
Even early psychological studies from 100+ years ago found that women, on average, feel and react to emotional stresses the same way as men. There are 100+ year old studies on PMS that say women, on average, don't express more anger or sadness prior to or while on a period - and yet we still get hysterical women PMSing memes.
Media can make us see patterns that aren't there. Media can change the way people view the world around them and affect how they behave.
I'm with you but just for the sake of hypothesizing an answer, it might be that those who like it or don't think too much about it just read, upvote, and move on. While those who have comments click and share.
It sarcastically describes my life as a man, especially when I try to be the top two people but every other man wants to be the bottom two. The title might glorify it but we aren't.
I don't know how serious one has to take themselves to find this "ultimately insulting". It's a silly meme and it's funny because most men can relate to it.
I'm no psychoanalyst but it sounds like someone is insecure in their ability to love and be loved and would prefer to guarantee a balanced reciprocity of low effort on both sides.
Maybe we should think about these memes less as complex thought-out statements, and more as reflections of the times they are created in, just like all art.
I think homosexuality has reached a level of societal acceptance(at least in the west), that it is ok to be ironically homophobic again.
Then again, some might argue that being against nazis was a societal norm, so being ironically nazi was fine too. Yet here we are now, where being unironically nazi is somewhat acceptable by a large part of the society.
I wouldn't say this is an insane take from that person, or misandrist really. I have no other meanings in regards to what that person says, but in this case this is a sensible take.
The whole meme is about how women are "hysterical" and overly emotional. While men are calm and chill creatures.
It caters to stereotypes that view women in a negative light. I know exactly zero women who act like this. Most women are calm and chill people as well. Unless you of course call them hysterical or overly emotional, then they can rightfully get a bit mad. You would probably react that way also. It kinda infantalizes you.
I would as a man, expect my best friend to tell me if he's moving, expecting a child, or is getting married, within a reasonable timeframe. That is within a couple of months.
Also it's not manly to share your life with a friend apparently.
I'm 40+ and a couple of months ago started therapy. I didn't even knew I needed therapy, went with my wife for couple therapy and it quickly turned into personal therapy.
What I learned after some tests is that I fall into the top 4% of men who are emotional closed off. This is pretty extreme, but maybe the worst part is, I never even knew. This is the stereotype we teach boys, men don't have emotions, they don't talk about emotions, etc.
Oh, friends assume sexual preference based on other things too. Like the way you eat a hotdog, what kind of car you drive, how quickly you can recognize that the song is by Kyle Minogue, how long you hold a sloppy french kiss with your homies, wether you you sit with your legs crossed or slow down on a yellow light.
"Low maintenance friendships", aka friendships.
Can't remember who I heard it from, but someone put it in a way that resonated well with me.
If it needs constant work, it's not a friendship. If you're friends, you can meet after not being in touch for five or ten years and continue exactly where you left off.
Edit: "constant" being the key word. It takes a lot of work achieve that level of friendship, but it may also be the only type worth having
This idea that any kind of relationship should be effortless and easy is, frankly, incredibly absurd. Good relationships (of which friendships are) take real effort and work. If you don't want to put that work in to it then you need a pet rock, not a friend.
Friendships take effort and work absolutely, but once you've made friends for life, they stick. I feel you've misunderstood what I was trying to say. People that are in constant need of you serving them or they say they'll stop being your friends were never your friends to begin with.
Probably doesn't work the same for everyone, but I've never been one to have a big circle of occasional pals or "friends" to hang out with. For the most part, with the people I connect with I develop very deep, lifelong friendships that work through thick and thin because they're not based on what one can gain from another.
Yeah, active relationships take effort. However, the true friends I made growing up, I can hit them up or they can hit me up, after any number of years, and we pick up right where we left off... It hits different.