Lmao premium? My ass. That doesnt mean anything. BG3 was "premium" because of the soul put into it. Is this game anywhere near that? Does it at least tell me I'm pretty for the "premium" price?
I've spent more time in minecraft and terraria (and skylim, released in 2011, which I last played in 2023) than I have in any other games, and those aren't exactly what I'd call "premium". I'd agree that more than money needs to be poured into a game to make it good.
'premium' and not 'full price' can mean anything between .01 USD and 79.98 USD at this point when you've got a major console and publisher reporting bullshit 80 dollar price points.
You give these corporate jackasses a inch and they'll bend you over and I for one don't trust any of these AAA publishers.
My guess is they're looking at Nintendo here and seeing if they push 50 - 55 USD a 'premium', executive bullshit buzzword on par work AAAA gaming, over what is considered normal, 40 USD, now for a live service game.
Off topic but I genuinely can't understand why people like to throw battle royales and extraction shooters into the same pot. The fact that battle royales have been immensely successful (PUBG, Fortnite, Apex) while the only extraction shooter with relative success is Escape From Tarkov (I won't get into the details but pretty much everyone hates to play) should be indication that any similarities between the two genres are entirely superficial.
It's wild indeed. The worst part about this comparison is that people say it'll fail because of the competition, but there's literally 0 competition in the genre from big studios. The only three somewhat successful games are Delta Force, Hunt Showdown and Escape from Tarkov, two of those are premium games, one where people are willing to pay 250$ for it. It's even a genre where people mostly want it to be paid to reduce cheating.
To a layman like me the gameplay looks the same. Groups of 2-3 people exploring a large map for resources. Encountering other groups and looting on the way. Extraction shooter to me just means more money on micro-transactions like bank slots.
I gotta say, first time I heard of Concord, was two days after release. The headline which introduced me to Concord was "Concord only has X active players". At least I'm hearing about Marathon before it comes out.
Something on the line "We wish we could charge you the 80$, AAA, price; hoverer, we didn't implemented decent AI bot for you to play with/against... so we need players themselves to do the job"
So... is there any relation to the Marathon that came out in 1994 by Bungie?
Because... the art style genuinely looks awesome but I don't see anything that reminds me of the original. Not in enemies, or gameplay, or plot, it also seems entirely online multi-player, I see no rogue AI.
Honestly I would be intrigued by the art style alone but... the shameless name grab makes me think it's gonna flop.
I've seen a few of the famous quotes, but the Marathon itself is too spherical to be the old flying Space Spud. Bungie has often referred back to Old Marathon but this feels off. It's like someone is doing this only reading Wikiquote and a few summaries.
I did see hints of Tau Ceti's spaceport being nuked, and the involvement of MIDA as a contractor, so there's a few hints of the deep lore.
They're cagey about the story as well, suggesting they don't have a written one yet. I'll bet they were starting towards a proper story and an author keen on the original Marathon left with the pieces sat idle in the meantime as the game grew.
It also feels incomplete, lots of pve features despite pvp extraction as the stated goal. I think this was intended to have multiple game modes, several factions trying to find something left behind, Tycho making a move on the ruins controlled by fragments of Leela. Throw in a bonus UESC force Sent by a hint from Durandal who is still off having his own brand of fun elsewhere. Perhaps Straus's plans with the Colony long term come up.
A dream perhaps. On an Idea for a new Aleph One Scenario.
Such a shame. I do think Halo was very much already the spiritual successor to Marathon, and I know all the studios just want to have the big multiplayer game that everyone plays for years and years these days, but man was I excited when I first saw the teaser for this last year. I still name all my computer equipment after Marathon AIs.
I could play single-player games like Witcher 3 over and over for the next 5 years and not miss a single thing put out by EA, Bethesda, etc. We've got other stuff to do.
Multiply whatever it ends up costing by the number of copies I'll be paying for, and you get... hmmm. Is that right? It keeps coming up zero. Must be this new A1-powered calculator.
What a manipulative headline. By premium, they mean it won't be free to play, and leaving the fact that they also said it won't be full priced out of the headline makes it clickbait. Fuck that awful website.
The last time I bought a game for $40 was in 2014, the last time I paid $60 was in 2011 (and it was a mistake).
While there will always be an endless surge of people willing to pay whatever price game companies demand and those people can't be convinced to care enough to change, if you're reading this I hope you're the kind of person who can look into the effectively infinite backlog of games that already exist and into the indie and AA space for new games at decent prices done with some actual passion.