You're viewing a single thread.
Well it's that, and a theory is a theory. You have a theory, you test it's hypothesis. If instead of a free classless stateless society you keep ending up with authoritarian states. You've invalidated your hypothesis. Disproven your theory, and need to change it. If you cling to the same old theory regardless of it working or not. Then it's not a theory, but a religion.
I like a quote from the German left party. Said: "Well a true democratic communism hasn't really had the chance to prove itself yet" - which got me to think. Maybe the democratic majority just doesn't want communism. Now why is that? I think because almost all the opinions and information they are being barraged with are coming from capitalist owned news or because most people need to have this illusion that their work or whatever they are doing will eventually make them be better off than their neighbors.
In capitalism, you have a bunch of psychopaths scrambling to the top, tearing each other down in the process. It's horrible, and many people suffer.
In communism, you have only a handful of psychopaths trying to scramble to the top. They get there unhindered. It's horrible, and many people suffer.
I think the problem isn't the system, it's the psychopaths.
We will never get rid of psychopaths. Any system that doesn't account for them is the problem. Better systems don't consolidate power in ways desirable and easily exploited by psychopaths. Any system that doesn't have real safeguards is the problem.
Turns out to get closer to what most people find ideal we'd... have to all......... agree... on stuff. Hard to make that happen when ideals are like a religion. Seems like a tool oligarchs would find useful.