x86 was supposed to be obsolete 30 years ago.
11 0 ReplyIt took me a few seconds to realise that graph is y=x*86-64.
76 0 ReplyI would have expected a graph within the interval 86-64 (or flipped I suppose). Now it makes sense again.
3 0 ReplySubtle shade, I like it
21 0 Reply
btw ARM Holdings stocks have entered what I consider the affordable range, since Trump is tanking the US economy. Still RISCy. Just sayan.
51 0 ReplyJust sayan.
42 0 Reply
This is accurate, am consuming RISC V (news) for the emotional high, temporary bursts of irrational hope and am addicted.
40 0 ReplyDon't worry, in a few years China will release some comparable and powerful RISC-V processors with some brand new in house fabs.
Although by that point it'll probably have 300% tariff, so probably stick to TSMC x86 and ARM anyway lol
4 0 ReplyI've never tried RISC-V but I still need my fix!
6 0 Reply
This hurts my brainhole.
Nice.9 0 ReplyIt’d be cool to learn about the machining of a processor but it’s unfortunately out of my reach
5 0 ReplyVS? Wasn't x86-64 originally an ARM creation?
2 0 ReplyNo, it was an AMD creation. Intel created their Itanium 64 bit architecture but it failed and died out completely
13 0 ReplyAh, right, I got my acronyms confused.
5 0 Reply
Wow, just wow.
6 0 ReplyRisc 5 is the hand.
4 0 Reply