Ah yes. "Muted".
If you should be aware of anything, it should be that if you have an Internet connected microphone the only way to truly know it's muted is to remove it from power.
And now they don’t even give a shit about pretending to hide it
I had a few Google Home devices, they had a switch to turn off the mic. I assume it was legit switch, because the thing literally yelled at you and had bright red lights any time you muted it. It literally said "The mic is turned off" every time it booted up in a voice that reminds me of a child tattling on their sibling.
Have some too, I would not be surprised if it's a software driven hardware switch lol
Preferably, by throwing it out a 6th-floor window
This sign implies they're fully aware of how unsafe it is to have a device like that. SO WHY THE FUCK DO THEY HAVE ONE?!
Please remember to unplug and throw the echo out of the building. Preferably into a woodchipper.
Only acceptable if their mute button is a hammer.
Ah yes, the"mute" feature, a.k.a. "I'm not listening, pinky promise! 😇."
Alexa, please unmute!
Pull the fuckin plug, holy shit. It’s not that hard.
I worked for a couple years at a residential school where a lot of the kids had significant medical issues (to the point part of our training was on HIPAA). Tons of kids had echo devices, and I spent a significant chunk of my time there trying to get anyone to take seriously the huge privacy risk those things posed.
Is it more of a risk than your cell phone?
Why is there a mugshot superimposed on this photo? It's just one of those psychological tests where most people don't see it because they expect the window to be reflecting something and they're just reading the sign?
It's the mugshot of Ted Kaczynski, AKA the Unabomber, who was quite famous for having an extreme aversion to technology and how he perceived its role in the downfall of society.
Yeah, wtf. Looks like a mugshot
Oh, I meant mugshot, but accidentally typed headshot. I fixed it. Thanks!
"Please do not say 'Down with Big Brother' unless the Telescreen is 'turned off'"
🙄
Not even turned off... Just muted. Because that's the same thing as not listening.
So very curious about the Ted Kaczynski photo in the background.
It's a meme that people will add his photo to images of technology acting in ways that it shouldn't.
Another example:
I want such a voice thingy, but 100% local.
Homeassistant is making porgress with this idea, but it's a slow progress.
That's how I feel about AI stuff too. Like, I'd love to "Ghibli-fi" my family like everyone else, but I'd prefer to run it locally rather than hand over family photos to one of these AI companies.
Miyazaki says AI art is an insult to life itself
Same boat. Tools like this and Gemini make managing my ADHD sooooo much easier. Having a JARVIS-esque "AI personal assistant" would make a lot of my struggles less debilitating. I'd even be willing to pay, as long as the data stayed private.
I think local voice to text algorithms have gotten pretty freaking accurate. You'd need a way to activate listen, send it over the router, then receive the output signal to an Arduino/Raspberry Pi to switch something on or off. I'm sure it's not terribly difficult to design, but I bet the subscription model is so lucrative no one with the know how would offer a local version.
The new update looks great! I'm yet to try it myself though.
It includes a way to automatically have the voice assistant ask a question, so you only have to respond. E.g. when you come home it can ask: Do you want to play some music? Or when you heat up the oven, it can ask if you want to set a timer. You then just reply with what you want. This is the kind of interaction that makes it feel a lot more like Jarvis IMO.
We had this policy at my last job, but not due to HIPAA. Any time "Alexa" came up in conversations, it was very common for peoples' devices to chime in, telling on them.
Granted, we were in tech, so we were very aware that these things aren't recording everything you say and sending the recordings off to motherbrain nor "spying", per se.
I recall them being caught of being in the possession of recordings they shouldn’t have had.
On top of this the option of not sending recordings to the cloud is being removed just now - so they stopped pretending to respect your privacy.
I'd need more (and reliable) information to comment on your first statement.
For your second statement, there were apparently a limited number of devices which could process some commands locally, but most devices never had that capability to begin with. For the ones that could, it sounds like Amazon is deprecating the functionality. Does that sound correct? Either way, that's still a substantially different situation from having a device that's recording everything you say and uploading it to the cloud.
