Give it about ten years and the popular style will pendulum back to fitted/tight clothing.
Just like it was before the current baggy trend and after the previous baggy trend, which was preceded by another tight trend, which was preceded by another baggy trend, and so on and so on
I wonder how much momentum there is in that pendulum?
I think it started swinging (at least in America) in the 30's. Between the scarcity of the depression and rationing during the war, fashions tended toward minimal. Then in the abundance of the 50's you got big puffy poodle skirts and zoot suits because we finally had a surplus.
Maybe I'm old-fashioned, but I don't think you should subject everyone in public to having to see the entire shape of your cock and balls in pants that are so tight you can't even walk in them.
I'm fairly certain that's New Street All Bar One in Birmingham. This is typical attire for tossers going out day drinking in Brum.
Also, these guys just look British. The short guy couldn't look more aggressively British if he was wearing the Union Jack and invading countries for their tea.
Also, I'm not sure these clothes cost too many pounds - lots of polyester there. No shade - I don't buy expensive clothes myself either.
I can't stand tight clothes especially shirts. There are very few things more annoying and uncomfortable than a shirt that desperately wants to burrow into your armpit.
As for the pants I can't say I'd enjoy needing a changing partner:
That moment when you have a pair of 36 and 44 waist shorts from the same company and both fit the same. Then you put on a 38 and they fall off your ass and a 40 is to tight. If there was more quality control in clothes I'd probably be a lot more apt to shop
Left guy is fine, I think. Proportional and his clothes fit. The ripped knees are questionable but w/e if he wants to tell us he's on his knees all day I won't judge.
It means 'loser'
It comes from the word 'jobber' who is a type of pro wrestler who's role is to lose and make the other guy look strong going in to more meaningful matches. (Synonyms: jabroni, enhancement talent, job guy, carpenter, fall guy)
Often these are young wrestlers cutting their teeth in the business. But there are some wrestlers who specialize in the role.
Note: some wrestlers (jobbers) find the word 'jobber' to be insulating, insinuating they are in the role due to lack of talent. The term enhancement talent is considered more respectful.
Junk too big, I'm too fat, and it's a douchy style when taken to the extreme of the photo. Wearing well fit clothes is good, but this is something else.
I regularly have trouble finding pants where the crotch doesn't crush things or make it look like I'm smuggling sausage, the waist is wide enough, and the legs don't look like they're parachutes. Usually settle for two of the three.
Walking in with my pants rolled up to mid-calf and the knees busted out like I've been giving head at the local truck stop for the last three weeks. I've got a full head of hair, yet I insist on shaving everything but the crown. I absolutely cannot grow a beard, and I refuse to get a proper shave. I'm wearing a watch in the year 2025, purely to show off how much money I can throw at one of the only allowed men's accessories. Neck. Tattoos. There's a 50/50 chance I'm wearing socks.
The entire cast of the Jersey Shore is lining up to get my number. Everyone else is staying at the distance necessary not to smell the patchouli.
Personally for me I have massive legs even without working out( benefits of overweight with the right genetics) and I can't get the skinny jeans past my calves. 🤷‍♂️
It would also look ridiculous on me.
I would never wear long jeans that are not long enough and low socks to expose my ankles, that would feel terrible.
As a woman who's had limited access to pockets for most of her life, why would anyone willingly choose to give up proper pants storage? Clearly, these men don't realize how privileged their existence has been.
Sometimes tight trousers have excellent pockets (menswear doesn't give a toss about pockets ruining the line of the clothing, even on skin tight clothing), like the man in the op photo with his phone deep in his right pocket
Yeah, losing pockets is a trade-off I don't always like. But some situations requires freedom of movement and the skintight pants are more aerodynamic. However I'm not into leggings, so jeans will do.