Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre launched his campaign on Sunday at the Museum of History across the Ottawa River from Parliament Hill.
They changed the headline on this article. It originally read, "Polievre launches campaign with a pitch to heal, 'a divided country'" which made me laugh because he's spent so much time whipping up the white grievance that carried Trump to power in the US and trying desperately to ride the same wave of populist bullshit with the same message as Trump. When he's railing about the, "woke" and "political correctness" that suggests that we can expect an all out assault of LGBTQ+ rights, brown people, books, and anything else they don't like.
Their opinion section is fetid shithole of right wing propaganda. Their news room accurately reported on what Poilievre said. We need to pay attention to the right wing media is saying because that's the teat that the aggrieved white are suckling at.
Thank you for pointing this out in big bold letters. Our citizens need to know when an article they read is being skewed towards the country that owns the media.
Keep your the good work!! Get this out to everyone when they post soft on US articles.
According to moral foundations theory, there are six pillars through which humans perceive morality
Caring
Fairness
Liberty
Authority
Loyalty
Sancity
The first three are known as individualizing foundations and the last three are known as binding foundations.
Liberals tend to prioritize the first three. Conservatives tend to prioritize all equally which can lead to some contradicting world views. But the last three are less important to liberals so are more apparent among conservatives.
Conservatives in general have higher threat sensitivity. They are very in-group focussed. They believe that authority is morally just for maintaining order within a group, loyalty can often matter more than caring or fairness and that the sanctity of the group and its traditions are paramount.
This is where Poilievre needs to be very careful. Canadian conservatives perceive America as a legitimate outgroup threat and so their love language right now would be authority, loyalty and maintaining the sanctity of Canadian traditions.
Essentially, they would swoon over the Canadian version of Trump but that doesn't exist so what are our options? Right now, Carney has the advantage of being prime minister and taking a relatively strong stance against Trump.
Trudeau and Ford rushed over to the US to beg for exceptions while Carney has said he isn't going there to talk until they at least acknowledge our sovereignty. He's speaking a conservative love language by being authoritative.
Unless Poilievre can flip that script, he's going to have to get used to going from front runner to underdog at the flip of a switch. Starting with being "respectful but firm" is a weak response which will hurt his perception among conservatives.
Really need to get billboards up and out in Alberta to let the bulk of their citizens know the media they’re reading with a Pro US agenda are American owned and do not have the interests of Canadians at heart.
Doesn’t matter. As a united Canadiana, we need to try and get it through their head that we are 1 country united.
I think a lot of voters would reconsider if they actually understood their freedom was as stake from being bombarded by American based media conglomerates
Like every pro-Trump Canadian votes heavily conservative, which adds up, so they have to balance not getting primaried against being remotely viable in the actual election.
It will be interesting to see where this goes if they lose. Best case scenario, a new more anti-American conservatism arises. Worst case scenario they double down without collapsing and then eventually win a government by sheer force of FPTP.
Oh he'll be hard on Trump all right. Beyond having an eminently punchable face, I have it from a very reliable source that pp is an absolutely vicious power bottom. He's gonna say so many mean things to Trump!
The creator of "boots not suits", good luck finding him not wearing a suit up until he declared that campaign, then he literally just took the suit jacket off but was awkwardly wearing the rest of the suit.
Meanwhile, Elizabeth Danielle Smith, Premiere of Alberta, said this about Poilievre:
“So I would think that there’d be, there’s probably still always going to be areas that are skirmishes or disputes about particular industries when it comes to the border, but I would say, on balance, the perspective that Pierre would bring would be very much in sync with, I think…the new direction in America,” she added. “And I think we’d have a really great relationship for the period of time they’re both in.”