U.S. officials familiar with the planning said options for "reclaiming" the vital waterway include close cooperation with Panama's military and, absent that, possible war.
If I was younger, when the US starts a war in Greeland or Panamá, I would enroll to fight them. I'm sure the modern equivalent of international brigades will be created for exactly the same purpose they were created 89 years ago.
Common Dreams has been publishing for over 20 years, and is considered a generally reliable source of left-leaning news. It has a better rep than HuffPo or Breitbart, and it started in roughly the same era.
Can Trump just make Vance a temporary general or something and charge him with recruiting an army of MAGAsites to be his own personal division of Fluff Grinders to invade and subsequently be captured/imprisoned?
Not that I have any faith in the R congress to have a spine, but I'm not seeing how he even could do so if he wanted to without consent of Congress. Pretty well all the direct actions taken in the last couple decades come from the AUMF but that's at least theoretically supposed to be linked to terrorist activities.
Apparently part of the treaty that returned the canal to Panama means that either Panama or the US can unilaterally ensure the canal's neutrality if they feel it is threatened. So I'm sure they could make the argument that it falls under this. It would be bullshit, of course, but so are all of their other arguments.
Hold on! 3 school children from Panama are not there yet to be murdered by our weapons. How can Republicans live with theirselves if we don't get them? Give it a few more hours.