Is the moon too far for your data? IBM's Red Hat is teaming up with Axiom Space to send a data center into space
Is the moon too far for your data? IBM's Red Hat is teaming up with Axiom Space to send a data center into space
The prototype will run a number of off-world tests on the ISS
INB4 chumps discover that cooling hardware in a vacuum is, in fact, quite difficult.
In deep craters near the Moon's poles, permanent shadows keep the surface even colder — NASA's Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter has measured temperatures lower than -410°F (-246°C)
That's not the issue, though. In a vacuum there is no medium with which to carry the heat away. You can't send it into the air with fans or heat sinks because there isn't any air.
At least on the moon you could sink it into the ground. But in orbit you don't have that luxury. This is a major problem that spacecraft and satellite designs need to work around, and much effort is expended in that department.
Even though space is generally considered "cold," in the absence of a medium to sink heat into the best you can do is rely on infrared radiation which is not terribly effective.
What if me make a heat laser? /s
What would they use it for? The 2.5 seconds of latency would be too high for most uses. Cooling will be very difficult with no atmosphere. Solar power will be hard since night time lasts two weeks. Radiation will damage electronics unless they bury them.
Craters at poles are in permanent shadows with -200 degrees permanently
No hurricanes, earthquakes, floods, or other types of disasters on the moon. Asteroids are rare enough now that they basically don't count.
Latency is high but it doesnt matter for data redundancy.
Anything that needs a lot of data. Same reason you'd download something to your PC instead of streaming it.
Also for local processing before upload. If you have a huge data set that compresses well, it's much better to compress first, then upload to Earth.
Seems like the moon would be close enough for our standard IPv6 TTLs to work, but it seems more likely that we will have to abandon domain names in favor of something like IPFS, since it's a resource locator instead of a location locator. If you were on Mars, for example, you would not want to have to contact Earth every single time you wanted to load a web page. And so you would contact Earth the first time to load it. And then it would be saved locally. And so anybody who requested that page in the future would talk to you instead of Earth.
Sounds like some sort of decentralized federation of server resources. I don't know, seems a bit advanced. /s
Well I guess that's what it takes to make Microsoft's ocean bottom data center look reasonable. 😬
I wonder what the moon’s top level domain name would be?
.luna
We've had .moon and .mars since 2009
Edit: Looks like r/CryptoCurrency has recently acquired the .moon TLD.