Hey yall remember when the US imported a bunch of rocket scientists from this country in Europe when their gumming got taken over by drug-addled nationalists?
remember when the US started the communist scare menace, it caused many Chinese to flee and one resulted in chinas fastest development of the hydrogen bomb. this time it is worst since its against all stem.
I mean you get to trade one authoritarian government for another, just the other is super densly populated, polluted to all hell, and speaks a language you probably don't know. I mean, I guess China has their similarities to Silicon Valley, NYC, Chicago, etc.
Densely populated isn't a problem for everyone (I like dense), and the pollution isn't as bad as it used to be, right?
The authoritarian part is a major major issue of course, but my layperson perceptions of the material conditions of China is that it's not nearly as bad as it used to be, and is getting better
For 99% of Americans the authoritarian part means "I'm poor as fuck and live in a cardboard box on a rural dirt road but at least I can freely say 'removed!' and wont get arrested! GERD BLERSSS MERRIKER!!"
Whelp, I know who to call traitors.tl the free world: anyone who takes the bait here. Not saying America is the better option currently, but definitely a lot better than the "There's No Genocide In Xinjiang Despite An Independent Tribunal Saying There Is!" China team.
The most documented genocide in human history is happening in gaza and is fully funded and supported to the point of prisons and deportation in America. This "independent tribunal" never went to xinyang and are an arm of American global influence. How fucking stupid are you, you live in the most facist, evil and more imperialistic nation on earth, tens of millions unnecessarily died because of America this century. who are you to point fingers at literally any nation when your nation was born from the genocide of an entire continent!! Go read a book, Jesus Christ
The US is not better than China, and there's absolutely no evidence for anything close to a genocide in Xinjiang, if there was then the UN investigatiors sent specifically to find it would probably have found it
It was basically born out of a panic over a short term shortage. Like many industry observers accurately stated that the shortages will subside long before any of the CHIPS spending could even possibly make a difference. Then the tech companies will point to this as a reason not to spend the money they were given.
That largely came to pass, with the potential exception of GPUs in the wake of the LLM craze.
Of course, if you wanted to give the economy any hope for viable electronics while also massively screwing over imports, this would have been your shot. So it seems strategically at odds with the whole "make domestic manufucating happen" rhetoric.
Like many industry observers accurately stated that the shortages will subside long before any of the CHIPS spending could even possibly make a difference.
If you consider advanced microprocessors a strategic asset, the immediate short-term pinch in supply isn't the problem. Its the long-term overseas outsourcing of production to regions we consider at high risk of foreign conflicts (Taiwan and South Korea). Simply moving finished chips across the Pacific Ocean is its own strategic problem.
One could easily argue that our steadily ratcheted hostilities toward China, Russia, and Iran is the actual root cause of our problems. And we'd do well to in-source production for supply flow reasons, but our real panacea might be to simply stop fucking around at the periphery of a rival imperial power.
But if you consider the Russian, Chinese, and Iranian peoples as inherently adversarial to the American way of life (on account of them hating us for our freedoms), then relying on Samsung and TMSC as your primary supply of chipsets seems imprudent.
Of course, if you wanted to give the economy any hope for viable electronics while also massively screwing over imports, this would have been your shot. So it seems strategically at odds with the whole “make domestic manufucating happen” rhetoric.
A big central problem of the US chips strategy is that we're not building capacity, we're building investment incentives. The goal is to make local manufacturing profitable rather than productive. But that's at the root of the ideological divide between American and the BRICS we're positioning ourselves in opposition to.
We wouldn't be threatening war with these countries if we had a strong global socio-economic consensus.
Been happening for a lot longer than we like to admit. Students coming to the US for education and then returning home to work have been the norm since the early '00s, on account of the US higher education system being highly subsidized by the States and Feds. This made US education relatively cheap for its quality, especially at the state university level.
But that was good, actually, because we became a nexus of research and development. Lots of students came, got education, and left. Lots more stayed around, lured by the high paying jobs at domestic firms. A few even joined the education staff of the universities themselves. A bit of brain drain was fine, so long as we produced far more than we lost.
Now we're just hemorrhaging talent and expertise because we no longer value the work product of the professional classes. We're pricing people out of public universities and imposing strict ideological tests on the students we do let in. We're going full eugenics mode on senior staff and administration. And we're turning education more and more into a means of profiting off credentialing than accruing working knowledge or performing independent research.
America is dismantling all of its socialist institutions.